Bank of Baroda (U) Ltd-v- Mpungu & Sons Transporters Ltd (HCT-00-CC-CS 921 of 1997)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The court held that defendants were jointly and severally liable for UGX 126,944,136 on two unpaid loans secured by personal guarantees and a floating debenture. The sale of the defendant's motor vehicle under the debenture was lawful, as the debenture charged all present and future moveable assets. The court exercised discretion to award interest from date of judgment rather than filing, given the delay and the plaintiff's acceptance of unmarketable securities. The counterclaim was dismissed.
Outcome
Judgment entered for plaintiff; defendants jointly and severally liable for debt plus interest from judgment date
Facts
The plaintiff bank advanced two loans to the first defendant company: UGX 30 million on 17 June 1993 and UGX 60 million on 29 December 1994. The loans were secured by personal guarantees from the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th defendants (directors) and a floating debenture over the company's assets. The second loan was for purchase of an Isuzu bus. The defendants defaulted, and the plaintiff sold the bus in April 1997 for UGX 35 million (paid in three instalments). At the time of filing suit in September 1997, the outstanding balance was UGX 141,944,136. The parties agreed at scheduling that loans were taken as pleaded, secured as stated, and the balance remained outstanding except for the bus sale proceeds. The first defendant counterclaimed that the bus sale was unlawful, alleging it was pledged to UCB, undersold, and sold to an in-law without proper auction.
Issues
- Whether the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff, and if so, to what extent.
- Whether the 3rd defendant (in the counter claim) is liable on the loan.
- Whether the sale of the 1st defendant's motor vehicle was lawful.
- Whether the plaintiff is liable in conversion.
- What remedies, if any, are available to the parties.
Orders
- Judgment entered for the plaintiff against the defendants jointly and severally.
- Special damages awarded in the sum of UGX 126,944,136.
- Interest awarded at 24% per annum from the date of judgment until payment in full.
- Costs of the suit awarded to the plaintiff.
- Counterclaim dismissed with costs to the plaintiff/1st defendant in the counterclaim and 2nd defendant in the counterclaim.
Rules and key headnotes
Cases cited (2)
- Pearl Motors Limited v Bank of Baroda (U) Ltd (HCCS No. 562 of 1996)
- Harbutts Plasticide Ltd v Wayne Tank and Pump Co Ltd [1970] 1 All ER 225
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.