Bank of Uganda v Sudhir Ruparalia and Another [2023] UGSC 12
Cited — treatment unverified
cited in 1 (treatment unverified)
Derived from citing cases in the Wakilii corpus — not an assertion that this case is good law.
Legal issues
About this case
AI-generated summary — verify against the full judgment before relying on it.
Held that the same counsel cannot file separate bills of costs, and that instruction fees of UGX 45.8bn based on the suit's value—not the appeal's issue—were manifestly excessive and reduced.
Ask Wakilii about this case
Get a cited answer on how Bank of Uganda applies to your facts, grounded in Ugandan statutes and case law.
Research this case →
Source: this page presents Wakilii's issue analysis and metadata for a
publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Judgment text is sourced from the
Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org).
Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.