Barigye v Uganda (Criminal Appeal No. 46 of 2008)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The Court held that no right of appeal against conviction exists where an accused pleaded guilty and was convicted on his own plea, as there is no evidence on record to be re-evaluated. The sole ground of appeal, alleging failure to evaluate evidence, was misconceived and too general, offending Rule 66 which requires grounds to be stated concisely. An appeal is a creature of statute and no law grants such a right in these circumstances. Counsel having applied to withdraw the appeal, and the respondent having no objection, the Court dismissed it under Rule 70(1) of the Rules of the Court.
Outcome
Appeal dismissed upon withdrawal; conviction stands (appellant had already served his sentence and been discharged)
Facts
The appellant was indicted on 29 August 2005 for defilement contrary to Section 129(1) of the Penal Code Act, having allegedly defiled a 13-year-old girl in October 2004. He pleaded guilty to the offence and was convicted on his own plea of guilt, and on 3 July 2007 was sentenced to 10 years imprisonment. He appealed against conviction only, on a single ground alleging that the trial judge failed to adequately subject the evidence to scrutiny and evaluation. At the hearing of the appeal, the appellant was not present, having already served his sentence and been discharged from prison. His counsel applied for leave to withdraw the appeal, and the respondent had no objection.
Issues
- Whether an appeal against conviction lies where the appellant pleaded guilty and was convicted on his own plea.
- Whether the sole ground of appeal complied with the requirements of Rule 66 of the Rules of the Court of Appeal.
- Whether the appeal should be dismissed upon the appellant's counsel applying to withdraw it.
Orders
- Appeal dismissed under Rule 70(1) of the Rules of the Court of Appeal.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (3)
- Penal Code Act s.129(1)
- Rules of the Court of Appeal r.66
- Rules of the Court of Appeal r.70(1)
Cases cited (2)
- Attorney General vs Shah No. 4 [1971] EA 50
- Baku Raphael Obudra and Obinga Kania v Attorney General (Constitutional Petition No. 1 of 2005)
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.