Benlavi Investments Limited v Ghats Co (U) Limited [2026] UGHC 589
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The High Court struck out an appeal from a Deputy Registrar's decision for being filed outside the seven-day statutory period prescribed under Section 79(1)(b) of the Civil Procedure Act without obtaining leave of court. The court held that compliance with statutory timelines for appeals is a substantive jurisdictional requirement, not a mere procedural technicality, and that once an appeal is filed outside the statutory period without leave, the appellate court lacks jurisdiction to entertain it.
Outcome
Appeal struck out for being filed out of time without leave of court
Facts
The Appellant filed Civil Suit No. 1034 of 2024 against the Respondent for breach of a tenancy agreement concerning Plot 75, LRV 215, Folio 13, Jinja Road. The Appellant then filed Miscellaneous Application No. 1766 of 2024 seeking a temporary injunction to restrain the Respondent from evicting it from the suit premises. On 12 February 2025, the Deputy Registrar dismissed the application for temporary injunction and permitted the Respondent to re-enter the premises. Dissatisfied with this ruling, the Appellant filed Miscellaneous Appeal No. 0025 of 2025 on 7 April 2025, seeking to set aside the Deputy Registrar's decision. The Respondent objected that the appeal was filed out of time without seeking leave of court.
Issues
- Whether the appeal was filed within the statutory time limit prescribed under Section 79(1)(b) of the Civil Procedure Act.
- Whether leave of court was required and obtained to file the appeal out of time.
- Whether the court had jurisdiction to entertain the appeal filed outside the statutory period without leave.
Orders
- Appeal struck out.
- Costs awarded to the Respondent.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (4)
Cases cited (2)
- Alinyo v R [1974] EA 544
- Hamam Singh Bhogal t/a Hamam Singh & Co v Javda Karsan (1953) 20 EACA 17
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.