Besigwa v Stirling Civil Engineering Limited (Civil Suit No. 445 of 2014)
Observed later treatment
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The High Court held that the defendant employer was negligent in causing the death of the plaintiff's son, a casual labourer, who was buried alive by soil from a backhoe while working in an excavation pit. The defendant breached its duty of care by failing to provide adequate supervision, safety equipment, or emergency rescue measures. The court awarded special damages of UGX 6,000,000, loss of earnings of UGX 50,000,000, and general damages of UGX 30,000,000.
Outcome
Judgment entered in favour of the plaintiff with damages and costs awarded
Facts
On 4 January 2014, the deceased, Agaba Jonan Besigwa, a casual labourer employed by the defendant construction company, reported for duty at a road construction site at Kafumbe, Masaka Road. The defendant instructed him to work in an underground pit. While the deceased was working below, a backhoe operating nearby poured soil into the pit, completely burying him. There was no supervisor on site coordinating the excavation work. The deceased's father and fellow workers used spades to dig him out over approximately one hour. The deceased was transported to Nsambya Hospital on a boda boda, where he was pronounced dead. The defendant provided only a coffin; the plaintiff bore all other funeral and burial expenses.
Issues
- Whether the death of the late Agaba Besigwa Jonan was caused by the negligence of the defendant.
- Whether the plaintiff is entitled to the remedies sought in the plaint.
Orders
- A declaration that the deceased's death was caused by the negligence of the defendant.
- An award of special damages of UGX 6,000,000.
- An award for damages for loss of expectation of UGX 50,000,000.
- An award of general damages of UGX 30,000,000.
- Interest at court rate from the date of cause of action until payment in full.
- Costs of the suit to the plaintiff.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (8)
- Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act Cap.79 s.5
- Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act Cap.79 s.6
- Evidence Act s.101
- Evidence Act s.103
- Employment Act s.45(3)
- Occupational Safety and Health Act 2006 No.9 of 2006 s.26
- Occupational Safety and Health Act 2006 No.9 of 2006 s.50
- Civil Procedure Rules SI.71-1 Order 15 Rule 5
Cases cited (13)
- Blyth v Birmingham Water Works (1856) 11 Ex 78
- Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562
- Mukasa v Singh & Others [1969] EA 422
- Embu Public Road Services Ltd v Riimi [1968] EA 22
- Muwonge v Attorney General [1967] EA 17
- Borham-Carter v Hyde Park Hotel [1948] 64 TLR
- Stanbic Bank Uganda Ltd v Sekalega (Civil Suit No. 18 of 2009)
- Kabunga Grace v Kisambira Sentamu Ismail (HCT-00-CV-0112 of 2009)
- Uganda Commercial Bank v Kigozi [2002] 1 EA 305
- Bullingha v Hughs [1949] 1 KB 643
- Daly v General Steel Navigation Co Ltd [1983] 3 All ER 696
- Livingstone v Ravensworth Coal Co (1880) 5 App Cas 259
- Robert Cuossens v Attorney General (Civil Appeal No. 8 of 1999)
Cases citing this judgment (2)
How later Ugandan judgments in the Wakilii corpus have cited this case. Treatment labels come from Sequitur — Uganda’s citator — each backed by a verbatim span from the citing judgment, and are not an assertion that this case is, or is not, good law.
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.