Home › Case law › Betuco (U) Limited & Another v Barclays Bank of Uganda Limited & 3 Others (Civil Appeal 1 of 2017)
Betuco (U) Limited & Another v Barclays Bank of Uganda Limited & 3 Others (Civil Appeal 1 of 2017)
Cited — treatment unverified
cited in 5 (treatment unverified)
Derived from citing cases in the Wakilii corpus — not an assertion that this case is good law.
Legal issues
About this case
AI-generated summary — verify against the full judgment before relying on it.
A consent judgment binds the parties and cannot be set aside absent fraud, mistake, misapprehension or breach of court policy; the second appeal was dismissed.
Ask Wakilii about this case
Get a cited answer on how Betuco (U) Limited & Another applies to your facts, grounded in Ugandan statutes and case law.
Research this case →
Source: this page presents Wakilii's issue analysis and metadata for a
publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Judgment text is sourced from the
Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org).
Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.