Bisangwa Kasimba Josephat and Bisons Consult International Limited v Diamond Trust Bank (U) Limited and Trust Auctioneers and General Bailiffs [2025] UGCOMMC 290
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The Court held that counsel's medical incapacitation constituted sufficient cause for non-appearance. The term sufficient cause depends on the circumstances of each case and must relate to the inability to take a particular step in time. Medical evidence showing counsel was indisposed on the hearing date demonstrated sufficient cause. The Court exercised inherent powers to set aside the dismissal order in the interest of justice.
Outcome
Dismissal order set aside and underlying application reinstated for hearing on merits
Facts
The applicants brought an application to set aside a dismissal order in Miscellaneous Application No. 0445 of 2022, which arose from Civil Suit No. 0429 of 2019. The underlying application had been dismissed for non-appearance on 27th January 2023. The applicants contended their counsel was physically incapacitated from attending court on that date. They adduced a medical form dated 15th January 2023 in support. The respondents argued the applicants and counsel were guilty of dilatory conduct, having filed the present application after one year, and had not demonstrated sufficient cause.
Issues
- Whether the Applicants were prevented by sufficient cause from appearing in Miscellaneous Application No. 0445 of 2022 when it was called for hearing
Orders
- The dismissal order in Miscellaneous Application No. 0445 of 2022 is set aside
- Miscellaneous Application No. 0445 of 2022 is reinstated and shall be heard on merits
- Costs shall be in the cause
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (7)
Cases cited (2)
- Florence Nabatanzi v Naome Zinsobedde (Supreme Court Criminal Appeal No. 5 of 1997)
- Jovelyn Barugahare v Attorney General (Supreme Court Criminal Appeal No. 28 of 1993)
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.