Bujra v Abdulla (Civil Appeal No. 106 of 1952 (Mornbsá))
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The magistrate had power under section 11 to transfer the suit but the order was irregular. However, section 16 precluded the appellant from raising the jurisdictional objection on appeal where he had consented to jurisdiction below and there was no want of inherent jurisdiction. The distinction is between want of jurisdiction (which cannot be waived) and irregular assumption of jurisdiction (which can be waived). The finding on facts was not perverse. The costs order against the plaintiff for the disallowed portion was improper absent special reasons and was set aside.
Outcome
Judgment varied by setting aside the costs order for the disallowed portion of the claim; otherwise judgment of the Liwali's Court affirmed
Facts
The plaintiff sued the defendant in the First Class Magistrate's Court at Malindi for Sh. 447/60 being the unpaid balance for goods supplied. After summons was issued, the defendant's Wakil applied for transfer to the Liwali's Court on grounds that he had no licence to appear in the magistrate's court and the defendant did not understand Kiswahili. The magistrate transferred the suit without consulting the plaintiff. The case was tried in the Liwali's Court without objection. The Liwali gave judgment for the plaintiff for Sh. 217/60 only, disallowing Sh. 230 relating to five bags of posho which the plaintiff failed to prove were sold and delivered. The Liwali ordered the plaintiff to pay the defendant's costs in respect of the disallowed portion. The plaintiff appealed.
Issues
- Whether the First Class Magistrate had power to transfer the suit to the Liwali's Court under section 11 of the Civil Procedure Ordinance.
- Whether the transfer order was irregular having been made after the magistrate assumed jurisdiction by issuing summons.
- Whether section 16 of the Civil Procedure Ordinance precluded the appellant from objecting to jurisdiction on appeal where no objection was taken in the court below.
- Whether the Liwali's finding against the plaintiff for part of his claim was against the weight of evidence.
- Whether the Liwali erred in law in awarding the defendant costs in respect of the disallowed portion of the claim.
Orders
- Appeal allowed in part.
- The order that the plaintiff pay the defendant's costs in respect of the disallowed portion of the claim (Sh. 230) is set aside.
- The respondent to pay one-half of the appellant's costs of the appeal.
- The order of 13 November 1953 that the plaintiff have costs of the adjournment in any event is unaffected.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (4)
- Civil Procedure Ordinance s.11
- Civil Procedure Ordinance s.16
- Civil Procedure Ordinance s.17
- Indian Civil Procedure Code s.21
Cases cited (2)
- Ledgard v Bull (1887) 13 IA 134
- Meenakshj Naidu v Subramania Sastri (1887) 14 IA 160
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.