Bukenya v Bukenya & 2 Others (Miscellaneous Application 497 of 2024)
Observed later treatment
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
Held that the applicant's signature on the petition for Letters of Administration was forged and the respondents made false representations that his whereabouts were unknown while concealing from court the existence of ongoing civil proceedings and the fact that they knew his location. The court found the applicant to be an aggrieved party whose right to be heard was infringed. The exparte order striking the applicant from the Certificate of No Objection was set aside, and the respondents were directed to surrender the Letters of Administration granted to them. The Commissioner Land Registration was directed to cancel all entries made pursuant to the flawed Letters of Administration.
Outcome
Exparte order set aside. Respondents directed to surrender Letters of Administration. Land registration entries cancelled.
Facts
The parties are siblings and beneficiaries of the estate of the Late Zakaria Bukenya. A Certificate of No Objection was issued on 8 December 2021 naming four siblings including the applicant Bukenya Twaha. The respondents filed Miscellaneous Application No. 70 of 2024 seeking to strike off the applicant from the Certificate of No Objection and have Letters of Administration issued to them alone. They alleged the applicant had disappeared to the USA with relevant documents and had intermeddled with the estate. The application proceeded exparte without service on the applicant and was granted on 25 January 2024. The respondents subsequently began transferring estate properties. The applicant filed this review application contending his signature on the petition for Letters of Administration was forged, he was never served, and the respondents knew his whereabouts and had concealed from court the existence of Civil Suit No. 156 of 2023 which they had filed against him in May 2023. Evidence showed the applicant and the second respondent both resided in Maryland, USA, approximately 10 kilometres apart.
Issues
- Whether the applicant is an aggrieved party entitled to seek review of the exparte order.
- Whether the applicant is entitled to the reliefs sought, namely vacation of the order striking him off the Certificate of No Objection and setting aside the Letters of Administration granted to respondents.
Orders
- Miscellaneous Application No. 70 of 2024 arising from Administration Cause No. 919 of 2023 set aside and orders therein vacated.
- Citation issued directing respondents to surrender and deliver to court the Letters of Administration and all certified copies granted on 25 January 2024 within 2 days.
- Order striking off applicant from Certificate of No Objection vacated and set aside.
- Letters of Administration granted in Miscellaneous Application No. 70 of 2024 set aside.
- Commissioner Land Registration directed to cancel all entries on Kyadondo Block 197 Plots 174, 175 and 868 entered on behalf of respondents as administrators.
- Commissioner Land Registration directed to cancel all entries on any registered land transferred by administrators under Administration Cause No. 919 of 2023.
- Costs awarded to the applicant.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (7)
- Civil Procedure Act Cap. 71 s.82
- Civil Procedure Act Cap. 71 s.98
- Judicature Act Cap. 13 s.33
- Civil Procedure Rules SI-71-1 Order 46 Rule 1
- Civil Procedure Rules SI-71-1 Order 52 Rule 1
- Civil Procedure Rules SI-71-1 Order 52 Rule 3
- Constitution of the Republic of Uganda Article 28
Cases cited (3)
- Re Nakivubo Chemist (U) Ltd [1979] HCB 12
- Chhajju Ram v Neki (1922) 49 I.A 144
- Yusuf v Nokrach [1971] EA 104
Cases citing this judgment (1)
How later Ugandan judgments in the Wakilii corpus have cited this case. Treatment labels come from Sequitur — Uganda’s citator — each backed by a verbatim span from the citing judgment, and are not an assertion that this case is, or is not, good law.
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.