Bukko Namutebi v Namutebi Kuruda (Civil Suit No. 219 of 2022)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The High Court Land Division ruled that a civil suit abates where the plaintiff fails to file summons for directions within 28 days from the date of the last reply as required by Order XIA rule 1(2) of the Civil Procedure Amendment Rules 2019. The suit was dismissed six months after the last reply without the required summons being filed.
Outcome
Suit abated for non-compliance with procedural requirements
Facts
The plaintiff filed a civil suit on 15 January 2022 seeking damages and a permanent injunction. The defendants filed their written statements of defence on 29 November 2022 and 9 December 2022 respectively. Six months elapsed from the date of the last reply without the plaintiff taking out summons for directions as required by the Civil Procedure Amendment Rules 2019.
Issues
- Whether the suit should abate for failure to file summons for directions within the prescribed time limit.
Orders
- Suit abates in accordance with Order XIA rule 1(2) of the Civil Procedure Amendment Rules 2019.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (2)
- Civil Procedure Amendment Rules 2019 Order XIA rule 1(2)
- Civil Procedure Amendment Rules 2019 Order VIII rule 18(5)
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.