Wakilii

Bumali & 5 Others v Badrudin (Miscellaneous Application 730 of 2024)

High Court · [2024] UGHCLD 200 · 2024 Application Dismissed AI-generated summary ↓ Download Pin to watchlist Add to matter
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Type
Application for stay of execution of decree pending determination of appeal
Decision
Application for stay of execution dismissed; parties await Court of Appeal determination of substantive appeal

Observed later treatment

No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.

Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.

AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.

Holding

An application for stay of execution of a decree pending appeal was dismissed where the applicants failed to establish an imminent threat of execution, as the warrants had been recalled by court following an earlier complaint, and where the applicants delayed five years from the date of the decree before seeking the stay without explanation.

Outcome

Application for stay of execution dismissed; parties await Court of Appeal determination of substantive appeal

Facts

The respondent obtained judgment and decree in Civil Suit No. 2379 of 2016 delivered on 15 March 2019 declaring the applicants trespassers and ordering eviction. The applicants filed an appeal (Civil Appeal No. 86 of 2019) which remained pending before the Court of Appeal. The respondent as judgment creditor obtained warrants of execution in November 2023 to give vacant possession. Following the applicants' complaint letter of 5 February 2024, the High Court recalled those warrants pending a hearing on notice to show cause why execution should not issue. That application was dismissed on condition that the Court of Appeal would determine the appeal within two months, short of which execution would proceed. The two-month period lapsed and the applicants then filed this application to stay execution, five years after the original decree.

Issues

  1. Whether the application merits the grant of an order for stay of execution pending the determination of the appeal.
  2. What remedies are available to the parties.

Orders

  • Application dismissed.
  • Costs to abide the outcome of the appeal.

Rules and key headnotes

Civil Procedure — Stay of Execution — Test for Grant of Stay Pending Appeal
An applicant seeking stay of execution pending an appeal to the Court of Appeal must demonstrate: (i) filing of a notice of appeal; (ii) a serious and imminent threat of execution which if not stayed will render the appeal nugatory; (iii) that substantial loss will result unless the stay is granted; (iv) that the application was made without unreasonable delay; and (v) that security has been given for due performance of the decree.
Civil Procedure — Stay of Execution — Imminent Threat of Execution
An order for stay of execution can only issue where there is actual or presently threatened execution. Where execution warrants have been recalled by court and execution proceedings have been halted, there ceases to be any imminent threat of execution sufficient to ground an application for stay.
Civil Procedure — Stay of Execution — Delay
An appeal by itself does not operate as a stay of proceedings under a decree or order appealed from. Where an applicant files an appeal but takes no steps to stay execution for five years from the date of the judgment and offers no explanation for the delay, the applicant is guilty of dilatory conduct that militates against grant of a stay.

Legislation cited (5)

Cases cited (5)

  • Wilson v Church (1879) 12 Ch.D 454
  • Singh v Runda Coffee Estates Limited (1966) EA
  • Kyazze v Busingye (Supreme Court Civil Appeal No. 18 of 1990)
  • Sekikubo & Others v Attorney General & Others (Constitutional Application No. 03 of 2014)
  • Formula Feeds Limited & 2 Others v KCB Bank Limited (Miscellaneous Application No. 1647 of 2022)

Full judgment

↓ Download PDF

The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.

Bumali_&_5_Others_v_Badrudin_(Miscellaneous_Application_730_of_2024)_[2024]_UGHCLD_200_(26_July_2024)
Source: this page presents Wakilii’s issue analysis and metadata for a publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Any AI-generated summary is marked as such. Judgment text is sourced from the Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org). Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.