Home › Case law › Busingye Christopher and Another v Imelda Norah Rukanyangira and Another (Civil Appeal No. 419 of 2022)
Busingye Christopher and Another v Imelda Norah Rukanyangira and Another (Civil Appeal No. 419 of 2022)
Legal issues
About this case
AI-generated summary — verify against the full judgment before relying on it.
Held that civil contempt requires wilful and mala fide disobedience; renovating pre-existing structures in good faith was not contempt, so the penalty and damages were set aside.
Ask Wakilii about this case
Get a cited answer on how Busingye Christopher and Another applies to your facts, grounded in Ugandan statutes and case law.
Research this case →
Source: this page presents Wakilii's issue analysis and metadata for a
publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Judgment text is sourced from the
Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org).
Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.