Wakilii

Busingye v Mafundo and Another (Miscellaneous Application 3872 of 2023)

High Court · [2024] UGHCLD 252 · 2024 Application Granted AI-generated summary ↓ Download Pin to watchlist Add to matter
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Type
Application for leave to add party and amend plaint arising from civil suit for trespass
Decision
Attorney General added as 2nd Defendant; leave granted to amend plaint

Observed later treatment

No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.

Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.

AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.

Holding

The High Court granted leave to add the Attorney General as 2nd Defendant and to amend the plaint in an underlying trespass suit. The Attorney General, representing Uganda Police which claimed adverse possession of the suit land, was a necessary party whose presence was required to completely determine the questions involved. The proposed amendments did not introduce a new cause of action, avoided multiplicity of suits, and caused no prejudice to the respondents.

Outcome

Attorney General added as 2nd Defendant; leave granted to amend plaint

Facts

The applicant, registered proprietor of land comprised in Kyadondo Block 245 Plot 225 at Kabalagala, brought a trespass suit against the 1st respondent, a police officer. After taking possession and placing building materials on the land, the 1st respondent allegedly deployed Local Defence Units to guard the land during Covid-19 lockdown, preventing the applicant from utilizing it. The 1st respondent, through the Attorney General's office, filed a defence claiming Uganda Police had been in adverse possession of the suit property for over 40 years and that the 1st respondent had no personal interest as the land belonged to Uganda Police. The applicant then sought to add the Attorney General as a party and amend the plaint to reflect the Attorney General's claimed interest in the suit land.

Issues

  1. Whether the 2nd Respondent can be added as a party to Civil Suit No. 1014 of 2022.
  2. Whether the Applicant has shown grounds entitling her to be granted leave to amend the Plaint in civil suit No. 1014 of 2022.

Orders

  • Application granted.
  • The 2nd Respondent the Attorney General be added as the 2nd Defendant in Civil Suit number 1014 of 2022.
  • Each party bears their own costs.

Rules and key headnotes

Civil Procedure — Joinder of Parties — Necessary Party Test
For a person to be joined as a party, it must be established that the party has high interest in the case and it must be clearly demonstrated that the orders sought in the main suit would directly apply and affect the party to be added.
Civil Procedure — Joinder of Parties — Necessary Party When Representative Claims Interest
Where the Attorney General representing a public institution files a defence claiming the institution has an interest in suit property by way of adverse possession and is conducting the suit on behalf of the defendant, the Attorney General is a necessary party whose addition is vital for complete determination of the main suit.
Civil Procedure — Amendment of Pleadings — Principles Governing Grant of Leave
Leave to amend pleadings may be granted at any stage if the amendment does not cause injustice to the other party, avoids multiplicity of proceedings, is not made mala fide, is not expressly prohibited by law, and the other party can be compensated by costs.

Legislation cited (10)

Cases cited (3)

  • Kamuntu v Makomboki Tea Factory Ltd [1981] 1 EA 154
  • Inre Duke v Castelino [1958] EA 461
  • Gaso Transporter Services Ltd v Martin Adala Obene (Supreme Court Civil Appeal No. 04 of 1994)

Full judgment

↓ Download PDF

The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.

Busingye_v_Mafundo_and_Another_(Miscellaneous_Application_3872_of_2023)_[2024]_UGHCLD_252_(30_October_2024)
Source: this page presents Wakilii’s issue analysis and metadata for a publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Any AI-generated summary is marked as such. Judgment text is sourced from the Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org). Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.