Wakilii

Buzige and Another v Mugarra and Others (HCT-01-LD-MA-0051-2025)

High Court · [2025] UGHC 745 · 2025 Application Dismissed AI-generated summary ↓ Download Pin to watchlist Add to matter
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Type
Application for interim stay of execution pending hearing of main application for stay
Decision
Application dismissed; no interim stay granted

Observed later treatment

No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.

Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.

AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.

Holding

An interim stay of execution cannot be granted where the substantive application for stay has already been heard and dismissed. The fundamental condition for granting an interim stay — that a substantive application is pending — is not met when the main application has been determined. The purpose of an interim order is to preserve the status quo pending investigation of the merits of the substantive application; once that application has been dismissed on its merits, there is no basis for an interim order.

Outcome

Application dismissed; no interim stay granted

Facts

The applicants filed a land suit in 2015 claiming ownership of land in Kyenjojo District. On 3 April 2024, the High Court ruled in favour of the respondents, ordering the applicants to vacate the land, pay general damages of UGX 30,000,000 with 20% interest, and costs. The applicants filed Civil Appeal No. 987 of 2024 in the Court of Appeal and sought a stay of execution through Miscellaneous Application No. 05 of 2025, which was dismissed with costs on 30 May 2025. The respondents commenced execution proceedings, and the Deputy Registrar allowed execution to issue. The applicants then filed this application for an interim stay of execution pending the hearing of the main application. However, the main application had already been dismissed by the time this interim application was heard.

Issues

  1. Whether this is a proper case for grant of an interim stay of execution.
  2. What remedies are available to the parties?

Orders

  • Application for interim stay of execution dismissed.
  • No order as to costs.

Rules and key headnotes

Civil Procedure — Stay of Execution — Interim Stay — Conditions for Grant
An interim stay of execution may be granted if three conditions are satisfied: (1) a competent notice of appeal; (2) a substantive application for stay pending; and (3) a serious threat of execution before the hearing of the substantive application.
Civil Procedure — Stay of Execution — Interim Stay — Effect of Dismissal of Main Application
Where a substantive application for stay of execution has been heard and dismissed on its merits, an application for an interim stay of execution cannot be granted because the fundamental condition that a substantive application is pending is no longer met.
Civil Procedure — Stay of Execution — Interim Stay — Purpose and Function
The purpose of an interim order of stay is to preserve the prevailing status quo and avert an imminent threat to property or the subject in dispute pending the investigation of the merits of the substantive application for stay.

Legislation cited (10)

Cases cited (5)

  • Lubega v Attorney General and 2 Others (SCMA No. 13 of 2015)
  • Amos Bakeine v Ssempemba Denis (HCMA No. 155 of 2017)
  • Hwang Sung Industries Ltd v Tajdin Hussein and 2 Others (SC Civil Application No. 19 of 2008)
  • Zubeda Mohamed and Another v Laila Wallia and Another (Civil Reference No. 07 of 2016)
  • Patrick Kaumba Wiltshire v Ismail Dabule (Supreme Court Civil Application No. 03 of 2018)

Full judgment

↓ Download PDF

The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.

Buzige and Another v Mugarra and Others (HCT-01-LD-MA-0051-2025) [2025] UGHC 745 (18 August 2025)
Source: this page presents Wakilii’s issue analysis and metadata for a publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Any AI-generated summary is marked as such. Judgment text is sourced from the Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org). Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.