Bwiriza v Osapil (Civil Appeal 5 of 2002)
Legal issues
About this case
AI-generated summary — verify against the full judgment before relying on it.
Held that a sub-purchaser's loss from retention of a logbook was too remote, and property never passed to her seller, to found liability in tort.
Ask Wakilii about this case
Get a cited answer on how Bwiriza applies to your facts, grounded in Ugandan statutes and case law.
Research this case →
Source: this page presents Wakilii's issue analysis and metadata for a
publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Judgment text is sourced from the
Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org).
Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.