Byakutaaga Asiimwe v Commissioner Land Registration (Civil Suit 51 of 2024)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
Held that the Commissioner for Land Registration violated Article 44(c) of the 1995 Constitution and section 91(2)(d) and (2a) of the Land Act by cancelling the plaintiff's certificate of title without notice or hearing. The cancellation was declared illegal. The court ordered reinstatement of the certificate of title and return of the duplicate certificate or issuance of a special certificate. General damages of UGX 20,000,000 were awarded for the inconvenience and psychological torture suffered by the plaintiff since 2017.
Outcome
Certificate of title ordered reinstated and defendant directed to return or reissue the certificate. Plaintiff awarded damages and costs.
Facts
The plaintiff was the registered proprietor of approximately 251 hectares of land at Kiina-Buhuka, Hoima District, which he lawfully acquired in December 2002 and later obtained a freehold title on 18 March 2007. In 2017, upon conducting an official search at the Lands office in Masindi, the plaintiff discovered that his certificate of title had been cancelled by the defendant on the grounds that it had been illegally procured. The plaintiff was never notified of the intended cancellation and was not afforded a hearing before the cancellation. When he approached the defendant's office, he was informed he would be compensated for the loss of his land but no compensation was paid. The plaintiff has been unable to freely transact in his land since 2017.
Issues
- Whether the defendant's cancellation of the plaintiff's certificate of title without according him a hearing was illegal and unlawful.
- Whether the plaintiff is entitled to an order for reinstatement of his certificate of title.
- Whether the plaintiff is entitled to general damages for the inconvenience and psychological torture suffered as a result of the defendant's actions.
Orders
- Declared that the action of the Defendant of cancelling the Plaintiff's Certificate of Title comprised in FRV 632 Folio 23, Buhaguzi Block 3, Plot 35, land at Kiina-Buhuka, Hoima District without advancing any reason and affording him a hearing was illegal.
- Defendant ordered to reinstate and/or restore the Plaintiff's Certificate of Title.
- Defendant ordered to return to the Plaintiff the duplicate Certificate of Title for the suit land or in the alternative, process and deliver to the plaintiff a Special Certificate of Title of the same description.
- Plaintiff awarded general damages of UGX 20,000,000 with interest at a rate of 18% per annum till payment in full.
- Costs of this suit awarded to the plaintiff.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (8)
- Land Act s.91(1)
- Land Act s.91(2)(d)
- Land Act s.91(2a)
- Constitution of Uganda 1995 Article 44(c)
- Evidence Act s.101
- Civil Procedure Act s.27(2)
- Civil Procedure Rules O.9 r.10
- Civil Procedure Rules O.9 r.11(2)
Cases cited (5)
- Lugazi Progressive School & Anor v Serunjogi & Ors [2001-2005] 2 HCB 12
- Karugi & Anor v Kabiya & 3 Ors [1983] eKLR
- Robert Cuossens v Attorney General [1999] 1 EA 46
- James Fredrick Nsubuga v Attorney General (High Court Civil Suit No. 13 of 1993)
- Livingstone v Rawyards Coal Co [1880] 5 AC 25
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.