Byaruhanga v Fr. Ruvugwaho & Anor [2020] UGSC 31
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The Supreme Court held that where several executors or administrators have jointly proved a will or taken out administration, they must act jointly. Section 272 of the Succession Act must be read together with section 134 of the Registration of Titles Act, which requires all personal representatives to join and concur in every instrument relating to estate land. A single executor therefore cannot validly convey estate land without the concurrence of his co-executors. The Court of Appeal erred in holding otherwise. The appeal was partly allowed, but the earlier nullification of the appellant's own purchase and cancellation of his title — which he had not appealed — were maintained, so the suit land reverted to the deceased's estate.
Outcome
Appeal partly allowed; the sale and transfer to the respondents nullified and the appellant's title also cancelled, so the suit land reverts to the estate of the late Edward Kakooza Mukasa.
Facts
Edward Wilson Mukasa Kakooza, the registered proprietor of about 450 acres at Kyabobo, Gomba, died testate, appointing four executors who jointly obtained probate in 1999. In 2000, one executor, Edward Kalusi, registered himself alone as proprietor in his personal capacity and sold the land to the first respondent, who in turn sold to the second respondent. In 2001 the deceased's children sued the executors for mismanagement; by consent the probate was revoked and the children granted letters of administration, with undisposed estate property reverting to the estate. In 2003 the children, before formally obtaining letters of administration, sold the same land to the appellant, who was later registered as proprietor. When the appellant sought to take possession, the respondents resisted, the first respondent having lodged a caveat. The competing claims led to litigation through the Chief Magistrate's Court, the High Court and the Court of Appeal over which sale conferred good title.
Issues
- Whether section 272 of the Succession Act authorises a single executor or administrator of an estate to execute and complete a conveyancing transaction on behalf of the estate without the involvement of the other co-administrators appointed jointly with him or her.
Orders
- The appeal is partly allowed.
- The decision of the Court of Appeal is set aside save for the order for nullification of the appellant's purchase of the suit land and cancellation of his name from the title.
- A declaration is made that section 272 of the Succession Act does not confer powers on a single executor or administrator to singularly exercise powers vested in the joint executors or administrators with respect to conveyancing of estate land without the express consent or authority of the co-executors or co-administrators.
- The sale and transfer of the suit property to the respondents is nullified.
- The suit property shall revert to the estate of the late Edward Kakooza Mukasa to be administered in accordance with the law.
- An eviction order is issued against the respondents or any other occupants or users of the suit land.
- Each party shall bear their own costs.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (10)
- Succession Act s.272
- Succession Act s.185
- Succession Act s.273
- Registration of Titles Act s.134(1)
- Registration of Titles Act s.134(3)
- Registration of Titles Act s.2
- Judicature Act s.6(2)
- Supreme Court Rules r.83
- Supreme Court Rules r.30
- Supreme Court Rules r.27
Cases cited (5)
- Kifamunte Henry v Uganda (Criminal Appeal No. 10 of 1997)
- Rosemary Kabataizibwa Lwemamu v Francis Sembuya & Anor (HCCS No. 226 of 2005)
- Paul K. Ssemogerere v Attorney General (Constitutional Appeal No. 1 of 2002)
- Wesley Tusingwire v Attorney General (Constitutional Appeal No. 4 of 2016)
- Henry De Souza Figueiredo v George Blacquere Talbot and Another [1962] EA 167
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.