Home › Case law › Centre for Arbitration and Dispute Resolution (CEDER) and Another v Attorney General (Constitutional Petition No. 11 of 2019)
Centre for Arbitration and Dispute Resolution (CEDER) and Another v Attorney General (Constitutional Petition No. 11 of 2019)
Cited — treatment unverified
cited in 2 (treatment unverified)
Derived from citing cases in the Wakilii corpus — not an assertion that this case is good law.
Legal issues
About this case
AI-generated summary — verify against the full judgment before relying on it.
Held that CADER is an administrative body performing quasi-judicial functions, not a subordinate court, and is therefore subject to judicial review.
Ask Wakilii about this case
Get a cited answer on how Centre for Arbitration and Dispute Resolution (CEDER) and Another applies to your facts, grounded in Ugandan statutes and case law.
Research this case →
Source: this page presents Wakilii's issue analysis and metadata for a
publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Judgment text is sourced from the
Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org).
Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.