Chatta Investments Ltd v Winnie Okidi - (Civil Suit No. 631 of 2004)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
Where a defendant signs a sale agreement on behalf of an organisation and fails to prove that the organisation is a registered body corporate, the defendant is personally liable for the debt. The burden of proving incorporation rests on the party relying on corporate status as a defence. A personal cheque tendered as security further evidences personal liability rather than corporate obligation.
Outcome
Plaintiff awarded Ug.Shs.12,000,000/= as outstanding purchase price plus general damages of Ug.Shs.1,500,000/= and costs
Facts
By sale agreement dated 8 November 2003, the plaintiff company sold a Mitsubishi Pajero motor vehicle registration UAF 495D to the defendant for Ug.Shs.19,000,000/=. The defendant paid Ug.Shs.7,000,000/= cash and provided a post-dated cheque for Ug.Shs.12,000,000/= as security for the balance. The cheque was dishonoured twice when presented for payment. The defendant became evasive after the dishonoured cheque. The sale agreement was written in the names of the plaintiff company and War Affected Children Rehabilitation Organisation (WACRO), with the defendant signing on behalf of WACRO. The cheque provided as security was a personal cheque in the name of Easter Santos Okidi, not a corporate cheque. The defendant's counsel withdrew after losing contact with the defendant, and the defendant failed to appear despite substituted service.
Issues
- Whether the defendant Winnie Okidi is liable for the Ug.Shs.12,000,000/= being the balance of the purchase price of motor vehicle UAF 495D from the plaintiff
Orders
- Judgment for the plaintiff.
- Defendant liable for Ug.Shs.12,000,000/= being the balance of the purchase price.
- General damages of Ug.Shs.1,500,000/= awarded to the plaintiff.
- Costs awarded to the plaintiff.
Rules and key headnotes
Cases cited (1)
- John Magala v David Mukasa (HCCS 578 of 2004)
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.