Christine Kyewalabye v Eng. Sakwa Darlington (Miscellaneous Application No. 3167 of 2024)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
Court determined that where a decree orders interest at court rate without specifying the percentage, the applicable rate is 6% per annum under s.26(3) of the Civil Procedure Act. Interest on the decretal sum of UGX 75 million was calculated at 6% per annum from 28 April 2009 to 6 June 2022, totalling UGX 58,987,500. The applicant's claim for 18% interest was rejected.
Outcome
Interest quantified at UGX 58,987,500; respondent may execute consent judgment upon full payment
Facts
The applicant sought determination of interest payable on a decretal sum following a court order in M/A 1051 of 2024 directing the respondent to pay interest at court rate from date of judgment until payment in full. The original decree was in HCCS No. 73 of 2007, with judgment dated 28 April 2009 for UGX 75 million. The respondent paid the principal sum on 6 June 2022. The parties disagreed on the interest rate: the applicant claimed 18% per annum while the respondent computed 6% per annum, arriving at UGX 58 million. The applicant argued the court had not categorically declared the interest rate and that the respondent's computation was absurd and inconsistent with the ruling.
Issues
- What is the correct rate of interest payable on the decretal sum following the court's order for interest at court rate?
- What is the total amount of interest payable from the date of judgment until payment in full?
Orders
- Total interest payable is UGX 58,987,500.
- Upon payment of the entire decretal sum plus interest, the respondent shall be at liberty to execute the consent judgment.
- Each party shall meet their own costs for this application.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (2)
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.