Commission Nationale des Droits de L'Homme et des Liberté v Chad (Communication No. 74-92)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The African Commission found Chad responsible for serious and massive violations of human rights under the African Charter. The Commission held that states parties cannot derogate from Charter obligations during civil war or emergency, and that a state's failure to secure citizens' safety and investigate violations constitutes a breach even where violations are committed by non-state actors. Where a government fails to substantively respond to allegations, the Commission will decide on the facts provided by the complainant.
Outcome
Communication upheld; violations found; matter referred to OAU Assembly of Heads of State and Government under Article 58
Facts
The communication alleged widespread human rights violations in Chad during civil conflict, including harassment of journalists by unidentified individuals claimed to be government security agents, arbitrary arrest and detention of opposition party members and others without trial, killings of at least 15 people, wounding of 200, torture, disappearances, and assassinations including those of Bisso Mamadou and Joseph Betudi. The Government of Chad denied responsibility, claiming it had no control over violations by other parties during the civil war. The Government failed to provide substantive responses to the allegations, issue protection when warned of danger to individuals, or conduct investigations into killings. The Commission conducted the 18th Session hearing with only the complainant's representative present.
Issues
- Whether Chad violated the African Charter by failing to protect human rights during civil conflict.
- Whether a state can derogate from African Charter obligations during a state of emergency or civil war.
- Whether the state is responsible for human rights violations committed by non-state actors when it fails to provide security and conduct investigations.
- Whether the Commission should proceed on the basis of uncontested allegations where the respondent state fails to substantively respond.
Orders
- Communication declared admissible.
- Serious and massive violations of human rights in Chad found.
- Violations of Articles 4, 5, 6, and 7 of the African Charter found.
- Article 58 invoked to draw the attention of the Assembly of Heads of State and Government of the OAU to the violations.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (7)
- African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights Article 1
- African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights Article 4
- African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights Article 5
- African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights Article 6
- African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights Article 7
- African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights Article 10
- African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights Article 58
Cases cited (1)
- communications 59/91, 60/91, 64/91, 87/93 and 101/93
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.