Home › Case law › Commissioner General, Uganda Revenue Authority v Airtel (U) Limited (Civil Appeal 32 of 2020)
Commissioner General, Uganda Revenue Authority v Airtel (U) Limited (Civil Appeal 32 of 2020)
Legal issues
About this case
AI-generated summary — verify against the full judgment before relying on it.
Held that penal tax under Section 65(3) of the VAT Act keeps accruing during a tax objection and is not suspended by paying 30% to the Tax Appeals Tribunal.
Ask Wakilii about this case
Get a cited answer on how Commissioner General, Uganda Revenue Authority applies to your facts, grounded in Ugandan statutes and case law.
Research this case →
Source: this page presents Wakilii's issue analysis and metadata for a
publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Judgment text is sourced from the
Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org).
Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.