Home › Case law › Commissioner General Uganda Revenue Authority v Airtel Uganda Limited [2023] UGSC 45
Commissioner General Uganda Revenue Authority v Airtel Uganda Limited [2023] UGSC 45
Legal issues
About this case
AI-generated summary — verify against the full judgment before relying on it.
Penal tax under section 65(3) of the VAT Act accrues from the due date and is not suspended by lodging a tax objection in the Tax Appeals Tribunal.
Ask Wakilii about this case
Get a cited answer on how Commissioner General Uganda Revenue Authority applies to your facts, grounded in Ugandan statutes and case law.
Research this case →
Source: this page presents Wakilii's issue analysis and metadata for a
publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Judgment text is sourced from the
Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org).
Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.