Crane Bank Ltd & Anor v Belex Tours & Travel Ltd (Misc. Applics. No. 343 & 345 of 2013)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
Sitting as a single Justice, the Court granted interim orders staying execution of the Court of Appeal decree in Civil Appeal No. 71 of 2009 pending determination of the main applications for stay. The Court held the applications had not been overtaken by events because eviction of Fang Min had been halted and the applicants remained in possession; the decree required vacant possession, not the handing over of a running hotel business, so execution was incomplete. The conditions for an interim order were met: proper applications were lodged, substantive stay applications were pending, and an imminent threat of execution existed which would render the appeal nugatory. The certificate of title was ordered deposited in court as security.
Outcome
Interim order granted staying execution pending determination of the main applications for stay; certificate of title to be deposited in court
Facts
In Civil Appeal No. 71 of 2009 the Court of Appeal ruled in favour of Belex Tours and Travel Ltd against Crane Bank Limited and Ms Fang Min, ordering cancellation of Fang Min's registration over property at Plot 9 Ssezibwa Road, Kampala, reinstatement of Belex as proprietor, vacant possession, and substantial monetary awards. Crane Bank and Fang Min filed Notices of Appeal to the Supreme Court and main applications for stay of execution, together with applications for interim orders to preserve the status quo pending the main applications. A warrant was issued and court bailiffs attended the suit premises (Fang Fang Hotel), attempting to give vacant possession to Belex by locking the gates, but the exercise was halted by Police and an administrative stay from the Acting Head of Court. The applicants remained in possession and continued running the hotel. Belex argued the applications had abated because execution was complete; the applicants argued execution had only been attempted and not completed.
Issues
- Whether the applications for interim orders of stay of execution should be consolidated.
- Whether the applications had been overtaken by events because execution of the decree had allegedly already been carried out.
- Whether the conditions for granting an interim order of stay of execution pending the main applications were satisfied.
Orders
- Execution of the Judgment and orders of the Court of Appeal in Civil Appeal No. 071 of 2009 stayed pending determination of Court of Appeal Miscellaneous Application No. 344 of 2013, the main application for stay of execution.
- The certificate of title for the suit property comprised in LRV 2490 Folio 4 Plot 9 Ssezibwa Road be deposited in Court pending hearing and determination of the main application.
- The cost of this application shall be in the cause.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (4)
- Court of Appeal Rules r.2(2)
- Court of Appeal Rules r.6(2)(b)
- Court of Appeal Rules r.43(1)
- Court of Appeal Rules r.44(1)
Cases cited (2)
- Administrator General v National Social Security Fund and Others (Civil Application No. 2 of 2009)
- Hwang Sung Industries Ltd v Tajdin Hussein and Others (Civil Application No. 18 of 2008)
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.