Wakilii

Crown v Karigu (Confirmation. Case No. 316-1928.)

East African Court of Appeal · [1928] EACA 15 · 1928 Revision Allowed AI-generated summary ↓ Download Pin to watchlist Add to matter
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Type
Confirmation of sentence following conviction for theft
Decision
Accused to serve three years detention in reformatory in lieu of eighteen months imprisonment; fine of Sh. 980 affirmed; detention orders in lieu of fine quashed

Observed later treatment

No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.

Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.

AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.

Holding

The Court held that there is no power under the Reformatory Schools Ordinance to award detention in a reformatory in lieu of payment of a fine. The accused was convicted of theft under section 403 IPC and sentenced to eighteen months rigorous imprisonment, altered to three years detention in a reformatory. The fine of Sh. 980 was affirmed but the further orders for detention in lieu of fine were quashed.

Outcome

Accused to serve three years detention in reformatory in lieu of eighteen months imprisonment; fine of Sh. 980 affirmed; detention orders in lieu of fine quashed

Facts

The accused was convicted of an offence under section 403 of the Indian Penal Code in respect of seven sheep valued at Sh. 98. He was initially sentenced to eighteen months rigorous imprisonment, which was altered under the Reformatory Schools Ordinance to three years detention in a reformatory. He was further sentenced under the Theft of Stock and Produce Ordinance to a fine of Sh. 980, with an order for four years detention in the reformatory apparently in lieu of the fine. An additional sentence of six months detention in lieu of payment of fine was also imposed. The matter came before the Chief Justice for confirmation of sentence.

Issues

  1. Whether a court has power under the Reformatory Schools Ordinance to award detention in a reformatory in lieu of payment of a fine.

Orders

  • Sentence altered to eighteen months' imprisonment.
  • Instead of undergoing imprisonment, accused to be detained in reformatory for three years.
  • Fine of Sh. 980 affirmed.
  • Further orders for detention quashed.

Rules and key headnotes

Sentencing — Reformatory Schools Ordinance — Detention in Lieu of Fine
A court has no power under the Reformatory Schools Ordinance to award detention in a reformatory in lieu of payment of a fine.

Legislation cited (3)

  • Reformatory Schools Ordinance Cap. 89
  • Indian Penal Code s.403
  • Theft of Stock and Produce Ordinance

Full judgment

↓ Download PDF

The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.

Crown v Karigu (Confirmation. Case No. 316-1928.) [1928] EACA 15 (1 January 1928)
Source: this page presents Wakilii’s issue analysis and metadata for a publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Any AI-generated summary is marked as such. Judgment text is sourced from the Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org). Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.