Wakilii

Crown v Wachira (Revision Case 20A-1927.)

East African Court of Appeal · [1927] EACA 38 · 1927 Revision Allowed AI-generated summary ↓ Download Pin to watchlist Add to matter
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Type
Criminal revision from magistrate's court order
Decision
Magistrate's order set aside

Observed later treatment

No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.

Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.

AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.

Holding

Held that a clerical overseer in charge of an estate is not a servant as defined in section 2 of the Employment of Natives Ordinance. The accused's contract of service was a common law contract, not one to which the Ordinance applied. The magistrate's order authorising the complainant to withhold Sh. 15 under section 45(1)(a) was invalid and set aside.

Outcome

Magistrate's order set aside

Facts

The accused was a Kikuyu clerk who acted as a clerical overseer with the responsible position of being in charge of an estate. A European made periodic visits for supervision. The magistrate had made an order under section 45(1)(a) of the Employment of Natives Ordinance authorising the complainant to withhold Sh. 15 from the accused.

Issues

  1. Whether a clerical overseer in charge of an estate is a servant as defined in section 2 of the Employment of Natives Ordinance.

Orders

  • Order authorising the complainant to withhold Sh. 15 set aside.

Rules and key headnotes

Employment of Natives Ordinance — Definition of Servant — Clerical Overseer
A clerical overseer in charge of an estate who has the responsible position of managing the estate is not a servant as defined in section 2 of the Employment of Natives Ordinance.
Employment of Natives Ordinance — Application — Common Law Contract
Where an accused does not undertake to work as a labourer or herdsman under a contract, the provisions of the Employment of Natives Ordinance have no application and the employment is simply a common law contract.
Employment of Natives Ordinance — Section 45(1)(a) — Invalid Application
An order made under section 45(1)(a) of the Employment of Natives Ordinance authorising withholding of wages is invalid where the Ordinance does not apply to the contract of employment in question.

Legislation cited (2)

  • Employment of Natives Ordinance (Cap. 139) s.2
  • Employment of Natives Ordinance (Cap. 139) s.45(1)(a)

Full judgment

↓ Download PDF

The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.

Crown v Wachira (Revision Case 20A-1927.) [1927] EACA 38 (1 January 1927)
Source: this page presents Wakilii’s issue analysis and metadata for a publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Any AI-generated summary is marked as such. Judgment text is sourced from the Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org). Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.