Daliko v Katuramu (CIVIL APPEAL NO. 0127 OF 2013)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The High Court allowed the appeal, holding that the trial Magistrate erred in disregarding the seller's evidence that he had attempted to rectify the boundaries but the Respondent refused. The Court found the sale agreement to be a forgery for lack of signatures of both seller and buyer. The Respondent was held to be claiming more land than he purchased. The trial Magistrate was wrong in declaring the Appellant a trespasser.
Outcome
Appeal allowed; trial court judgment set aside; Appellant not declared a trespasser
Facts
The Respondent sued the Appellant claiming ownership of land allegedly purchased from Steven Byaruhanga in 1992 for UGX 200,000, seeking a declaration of ownership, trespass finding, and vacant possession. The Appellant claimed his father Kabuleta Augustine owned the land and had given him permission to cultivate it seasonally. The seller Byaruhanga testified that when the boundary dispute arose he attempted to rectify the boundaries but the Respondent refused and used Police to harass him. The trial court found for the Respondent after visiting locus. Two witnesses at locus testified they had used the land from 1992-1997 without interference.
Issues
- Whether the trial Magistrate erred in disregarding the evidence of the seller of the disputed land
- Whether the trial Magistrate erred in decreeing the suit land to the Respondent and declaring the Appellant a trespasser
Orders
- Appeal allowed.
- Costs to the Appellant.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (1)
Cases cited (2)
- Banco Arabe Espanol v Bank of Uganda (Supreme Court Civil Appeal No. 8 of 1998)
- Yeseri Waibi versus Edisa Lusi Byandala (1982) H.C.B 28
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.