Wakilii

David Bahati v Legacy Credit Limited (Civil Suit No. 1989 of 2024)

High Court · [2025] UGCOMMC 295 · 2025 Application Granted AI-generated summary ↓ Download Pin to watchlist Add to matter
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Type
Application for unconditional leave to appear and defend a summary suit arising from Civil Suit No. 1080 of 2024
Decision
Applicant granted leave to defend the main suit; matter to proceed to trial

Observed later treatment

No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.

Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.

AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.

Holding

The High Court granted the applicant unconditional leave to appear and defend a summary suit. The court held that where there is a dispute as to the amount borrowed (UGX 360,000,000 versus UGX 80,000,000), the nature of a cheque (postdated cheque versus blank cheque issued as security), and alleged repayments totalling UGX 100,000,000, these constitute triable issues of fact that must be determined at trial. The applicant need not show a good defence on the merits at this stage, only that there are bona fide triable issues.

Outcome

Applicant granted leave to defend the main suit; matter to proceed to trial

Facts

Legacy Credit Limited filed Civil Suit No. 1080 of 2024 against David Bahati seeking recovery of UGX 360,000,000 by way of summary suit. The respondent claimed that on 29 June 2022, the applicant received a friendly loan of UGX 360,000,000 and issued a postdated cheque for that amount dated 2 July 2024, which was subsequently dishonored due to insufficient funds. The applicant disputed the claim, asserting that he only borrowed UGX 80,000,000 at 10% monthly interest from the respondent, a moneylender. He contended that the cheque for UGX 360,000,000 was a blank cheque issued merely as security, not as acknowledgment of debt for that amount. The applicant further claimed to have repaid UGX 100,000,000 in three instalments between July and November 2023, though the respondent failed to issue formal receipts. The applicant challenged the legality of the transaction on grounds of excessive and unconscionable interest rates.

Issues

  1. Whether the application raises triable issues.
  2. What remedies are available to the parties?

Orders

  • The Applicant is granted unconditional leave to appear and defend in Civil Suit No. 1080 of 2024.
  • The Applicant shall file a written statement of defence within 10 days from the date of this order.
  • The costs of this application shall be in the cause.

Rules and key headnotes

Summary Suits — Leave to Appear and Defend — Test for Granting Leave
In an application for leave to appear and defend a summary suit under Order 36 of the Civil Procedure Rules, the applicant must show by affidavit that there is a bona fide triable issue of fact or law. The applicant is not required to show a good defence on the merits but must satisfy the court that there is an issue or question in dispute which ought to be tried. The court shall not enter upon the trial of the issues disclosed at this stage.
Summary Suits — Triable Issues — Disputes as to Amount and Nature of Transaction
Where there is a dispute as to the amount borrowed, the nature of a cheque issued (whether postdated cheque acknowledging debt or blank cheque issued as security), and alleged repayments, these constitute triable issues of fact that require determination at trial and warrant granting leave to defend.
Summary Suits — Purpose of Summary Procedure — Balance with Right to Defence
Order 36 of the Civil Procedure Rules was enacted to facilitate expeditious disposal of cases involving debts and contracts of a commercial nature and to prevent defendants from presenting frivolous or vexatious defences to unreasonably prolong litigation. However, where bona fide triable issues exist, leave to defend must be granted to ensure access to justice.

Legislation cited (4)

Cases cited (5)

Full judgment

↓ Download PDF

The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.

David Bahati v Legacy Credit Limited (Civil Suit No. 1989 of 2024) [2025] UGCommC 295 (10 June 2025)
Source: this page presents Wakilii’s issue analysis and metadata for a publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Any AI-generated summary is marked as such. Judgment text is sourced from the Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org). Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.