Wakilii
HomeCase law › David Welsey Tusingwire v Attorney General (Constitutional Appeal No. 4 of 2016)

David Welsey Tusingwire v Attorney General (Constitutional Appeal No. 4 of 2016)

Citation: [2017] UGSC 11 Court: Supreme Court Decided: 5 May 2017 Jurisdiction: Uganda
Treatment recorded in citing cases followed in 3 Derived from citing cases in the Wakilii corpus — not an assertion that this case is good law.

Legal issues

Constitutional LawAdministrative LawStatutory InterpretationEvidenceHuman Rights

About this case

AI-generated summary — verify against the full judgment before relying on it.

Practice directions designating magistrates to the High Court Anti-Corruption Division were a valid administrative act under Article 133 and did not unconstitutionally alter the High Court's composition.

Ask Wakilii about this case

Get a cited answer on how David Welsey Tusingwire applies to your facts, grounded in Ugandan statutes and case law.

Research this case →
Source: this page presents Wakilii's issue analysis and metadata for a publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Judgment text is sourced from the Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org). Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.