Desai v Jiwa (Civil Suit No. 77 of 1952)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The Court held that it has inherent jurisdiction under sections 63 and 97 of the Civil Procedure Ordinance and under Order 16 rule 4 of the Civil Procedure Rules to impose a time limit for payment of taxed costs and to order that the defence be struck out in default. The Court ordered that unless the defendant paid the taxed costs within 14 days of service of the taxation order, the defence would be struck out and the suit would proceed ex parte.
Outcome
Order made that defence be struck out and suit proceed ex parte if defendant fails to pay taxed costs within 14 days
Facts
The Court had previously ordered certain parts of the defendant's defence to be struck out following applications for further and better particulars and to strike out the defence. The defendant was ordered to pay the taxed costs of those applications. The costs were duly taxed but the defendant failed to pay as ordered. The plaintiff then applied for a further order that unless the costs were paid within a limited time after taxation, the defence be struck out entirely and the suit heard ex parte.
Issues
- Whether the Court has jurisdiction to make an order imposing a time limit for payment of taxed interlocutory costs and to strike out the defence in default of compliance.
Orders
- In default of the defendant's paying into Court the taxed costs ordered to be paid within 14 days of service of the taxation order, the defence be wholly struck out.
- In default of payment, the case may proceed ex parte.
- This order to be served on the defendant together with the taxation order.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (4)
- Civil Procedure Ordinance (Cap. 5) s.63
- Civil Procedure Ordinance (Cap. 5) s.97
- Civil Procedure (Revised) Rules, 1948 Order 16 rule 2
- Civil Procedure (Revised) Rules, 1948 Order 16 rule 4
Cases cited (3)
- Gauri Shankar v Musammat Manki Kunwar (1923) I.L.R. 45 All. 624
- Shaikh Saheb v Mahomed (1890) I.L.R. 13 Mad. 510
- East Indian Railway Co v Jit Mal (1925) I.L.R. 47 All. 538
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.