Wakilii

DFCU Bank Limited v Supply Master Uganda Limited and Another (Civil Appeal 1185 of 2021)

High Court · [2021] UGCOMMC 190 · 2021 Appeal Allowed AI-generated summary ↓ Download Pin to watchlist Add to matter
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Type
Appeal from decision of Deputy Registrar making garnishee order absolute
Decision
Garnishee order absolute set aside; garnishee order nisi vacated

Observed later treatment

Cited — treatment unverified cited in 1 (treatment unverified) Sequitur — Uganda’s citator · Derived from citing cases in the Wakilii corpus — not an assertion that this case is good law.

Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.

No adverse treatment recorded Cited 1 time with no adverse treatment recorded; not yet tested on the merits. Derived from citing cases in the Wakilii corpus — a deterministic signal, not legal advice.

AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.

Holding

The court held that a garnishee order absolute cannot be made where the garnishee does not owe the judgment debtor any money at the time the order is made. A garnishee order attaches only monies standing to the credit of the judgment debtor at the time the order nisi is served, not future deposits. Where the judgment debtor is insolvent or probably insolvent, the court will not allow one creditor to gain preference over others through garnishee proceedings.

Outcome

Garnishee order absolute set aside; garnishee order nisi vacated

Facts

By consent judgment dated 18 March 2020, the 2nd respondent undertook to pay the 1st respondent shs. 121,134,000 in two instalments. Upon default, the 1st respondent obtained a garnishee order nisi attaching funds in the 2nd respondent's account with the appellant bank. At the hearing to make the order absolute, the appellant presented evidence showing the account held only shs. 122,675 and that the 2nd respondent owed the bank shs. 1,100,000,000 in unpaid loans. The 1st respondent argued that as a business account, future deposits would satisfy the debt. The Deputy Registrar made the order absolute on this basis. The appellant appealed, arguing the order was improper as it did not owe the 2nd respondent any money.

Issues

  1. Whether the learned Deputy Registrar misdirected herself when she issued a garnishee order absolute where the garnishee did not owe the judgment debtor any money at the time the order was made.
  2. Whether the appeal was filed out of time and whether the court should extend time to validate the belated filing.
  3. Whether a garnishee order absolute should be made where the judgment debtor is insolvent or probably insolvent.

Orders

  • Time for filing the appeal extended and the belated filing validated.
  • Appeal allowed.
  • Garnishee order nisi vacated.
  • Garnishee order absolute set aside.
  • Each party to bear its own costs of the appeal and of the garnishee proceedings.

Rules and key headnotes

Civil Procedure — Garnishee Proceedings — Scope of Attachment — Monies Attachable
A garnishee order nisi attaches only monies standing to the credit of the judgment debtor at the time the order is served on the garnishee. It does not attach money paid into the bank account after service, nor does it attach future deposits or anticipated receipts.
Banking & Finance — Banker-Customer Relationship — Debtor-Creditor Relationship
The relationship between a banker and customer is one of debtor and creditor. A banker becomes a debtor to the customer only to the extent of monies actually deposited and credited to the account. Where a customer is overdrawn or indebted to the bank, the banker is the creditor and cannot be ordered to pay monies it does not owe.
Civil Procedure — Garnishee Proceedings — Insolvency — Preference of Creditors
Where it is clear that the court is dealing with an insolvent estate or an estate which is probably insolvent, the court will not allow one creditor to gain an advantage over others by obtaining a garnishee order. The policy of the law is that creditors should, so far as possible, be treated with equality.
Civil Procedure — Appeals — Extension of Time — Validation of Belated Steps
An appellate court may extend time for filing an appeal even after the prescribed period has elapsed and after the step has been taken, where the extension does not abridge, enlarge or modify any substantive right and is necessary to enable the court to correct an error of law.
Civil Procedure — Appeals from Registrars — Standard of Review — Discretionary Orders
An appellate court will not interfere with the exercise of discretion by a Registrar unless satisfied that the Registrar misdirected himself or herself on a matter of law or principle, or the decision is so clearly wrong as to amount to an injustice.

Legislation cited (6)

Cases cited (21)

  • Shanti v Hindocha and Others [1973] 1 EA 207
  • Mansukhalal Ramji Karia and Crane Finance Co Ltd v Attorney General and Two Others (Supreme Court Civil Application No. 1 of 2003)
  • Godfrey Magezi and Another v Sudhir Rupaleria (Supreme Court Civil Application No. 10 of 2002)
  • Crane Finance Co Ltd v Makerere Properties Ltd (Supreme Court Civil Appeal No. 1 of 2001)
  • Executrix of the Estate of Christine Mary N Tebajjukira and Another v Noel Grace Shalita (Supreme Court Civil Application No. 8 of 1988)
  • National Insurance Corporation v Mugenyi and Company Advocates [1987] HCB 28
  • Wasswa J Hannington and Another v Ochola Maria Onyango and Three Others [1992-93] HCB 103
  • Devji v Jinabhai (1934) 1 EACA 89
  • Mbogo and Another v Shah [1968] EA 93
  • HK Shah and Another v Osman Allu (1974) 14 EACA 45
  • Patel v R Gottifried (1963) 20 EACA 81
  • Haji Nadin Matovu v Ben Kiwanuka (Supreme Court Civil Application No. 12 of 1991)
  • Sheikh Jama v Dubat Farah [1959] 1 EA 789
  • Hussein Janmohamed and Sons v Twentsche Overseas Trading Co Ltd [1967] 1 EA 287
  • Banco Arabe Espanol v Bank of Uganda (Supreme Court Civil Appeal No. 8 of 1998)
  • Thomas James Arthur v Nyeri Electricity Undertaking [1961] 1 EA 492
  • Choice Investments Ltd v Jeromnimon [1981] 1 All ER 225
  • Makumbi Francis Xavier Gajuule v National Insurance Corporation [1979] HCB 230
  • Choice Investments Ltd v Jeromnimon [1981] QB 149
  • Pritchard v Westminster Bank Ltd [1969] 1 All ER 999
  • Rainbow v Moorgate Properties Ltd [1975] 1 WLR 788

Cases citing this judgment (1)

How later Ugandan judgments in the Wakilii corpus have cited this case. Treatment labels come from Sequitur — Uganda’s citator — each backed by a verbatim span from the citing judgment, and are not an assertion that this case is, or is not, good law.

Full judgment

↓ Download PDF

The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.

DFCU Bank Limited v Supply Master Uganda Limited and Another (Civil Appeal 1185 of 2021) [2021] UGCommC 190 (22 November 2021)
Source: this page presents Wakilii’s issue analysis and metadata for a publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Any AI-generated summary is marked as such. Judgment text is sourced from the Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org). Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.