Wakilii

DFCU Bank Ltd v Ann Persis Nakate Lusejjere (Miscellaneous Application 78 of 2003)

High Court · [2003] UGHC 118 · 2003 Application Dismissed AI-generated summary ↓ Download Pin to watchlist Add to matter
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Type
Application for stay of execution arising from Civil Suit No. 242 of 2002
Decision
Application for stay of execution dismissed

Observed later treatment

Cited — treatment unverified cited in 1 (treatment unverified) Sequitur — Uganda’s citator · Derived from citing cases in the Wakilii corpus — not an assertion that this case is good law.

Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.

No adverse treatment recorded Cited 1 time with no adverse treatment recorded; not yet tested on the merits. Derived from citing cases in the Wakilii corpus — a deterministic signal, not legal advice.

AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.

Holding

Held that the applicant failed to demonstrate good cause and special circumstances justifying a stay of execution. The applicant did not show the chances of success on appeal, did not prove the respondent would be unable to satisfy any judgment if the appeal succeeded, and did not rebut evidence that retaining the title would harm the respondent's ability to secure tenants. Application dismissed with costs.

Outcome

Application for stay of execution dismissed

Facts

The respondent mortgaged property on LRV 684 Folio 12 at Ntinda to Gold Trust Bank Ltd to secure a loan of Shs. 80 million to A.V. Enterprises. Gold Trust Bank Ltd was later sold to the applicant DFCU Bank Ltd. When the applicant sought to exercise its right of sale, the respondent filed Civil Suit No. 242 of 2002 claiming the applicant had no evidence that money was released to A.V. Enterprises. The applicant counter-claimed Shs. 35 million allegedly owing under the mortgage. Court decided the suit in favour of the respondent, ordering discharge of the mortgage and return of title deeds. The applicant appealed to the Court of Appeal and applied for stay of execution pending appeal.

Issues

  1. Whether the applicant satisfied the requirements for granting a stay of execution pending appeal.
  2. Whether the applicant demonstrated good cause and special circumstances justifying the grant of a stay of execution.

Orders

  • Application dismissed with costs.

Rules and key headnotes

Stay of Execution — Requirements for Grant — Good Cause and Special Circumstances
A stay of execution should be granted only if the court is satisfied that there is good cause to do so and there are special circumstances to justify such course.
Stay of Execution — Applicant's Burden — Demonstration of Prospects of Success
An applicant for stay of execution must demonstrate the chances of success on the intended appeal and not merely show that an appeal has been filed.
Stay of Execution — Proof of Inability to Satisfy Judgment
Where an applicant seeks a stay of execution on grounds that substantial loss would be suffered, the applicant must prove that if the stay is not granted and the appeal succeeds, the respondent would be unable to satisfy the judgment debt.

Legislation cited (3)

Cases cited (3)

  • Somali Democratic Republic v A.S. Treon (Civil Application No. 11 of 1988)
  • Neanea v Kimani [1959] E.A. 69
  • Iddi Halfani v Hamisi Binti Althumani [1962] E.A. 761

Cases citing this judgment (1)

How later Ugandan judgments in the Wakilii corpus have cited this case. Treatment labels come from Sequitur — Uganda’s citator — each backed by a verbatim span from the citing judgment, and are not an assertion that this case is, or is not, good law.

Full judgment

↓ Download PDF

The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.

DFCU Bank Ltd v Ann Persis Nakate Lusejjere (Miscellaneous Application 78 of 2003) [2003] UGHC 118 (24 March 2003)
Source: this page presents Wakilii’s issue analysis and metadata for a publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Any AI-generated summary is marked as such. Judgment text is sourced from the Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org). Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.