Diplomatic Duty Free Services Limited v The Commissioner General of Uganda Revenue Authority & Another (Civil Application 29 of 1994)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
Held that prima facie grounds existed for granting leave to apply for judicial review. Leave granted to seek certiorari requiring production of documents relating to the withholding of the applicant's goods and prohibition restraining sale of those goods to recover taxes allegedly owed by a third party. Interim order granted restraining disposal of goods pending the substantive application.
Outcome
Leave granted with interim injunction restraining disposal of goods pending substantive hearing
Facts
In early January 1994, the Uganda Revenue Authority held goods imported by the applicant, Diplomatic Duty Free Services Limited. The respondents sought to sell the applicant's goods to recover taxes allegedly owed by a third party, M/S Kasaasi Coffee Growers and Processors Ltd. The applicant filed an ex parte chamber summons seeking leave to apply for judicial review, specifically orders of certiorari to require production of all documents and proceedings leading to the decision to withhold the goods, and prohibition to prevent their sale. The application was supported by an affirmation from Nasser Ntege Ssebagala and annexed correspondence and corporate documents.
Issues
- Whether the applicant has established prima facie grounds for leave to apply for judicial review
- Whether leave should be granted to seek orders of certiorari and prohibition against the respondents
Orders
- Leave granted to the applicant to apply for orders of certiorari and prohibition.
- The respondent to be served with Notice of Motion of the application for the orders sought.
- No sale or disposal of the goods withheld by the Respondents or their servants until disposal of the main application or until further orders of this court.
- Costs of this application in the cause.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (3)
- Judicature Act 1967 s.36
- Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) (Rules of Court) Rules (S.I. 77-1) Rule 3
- Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) (Rules of Court) Rules (S.I. 77-1) Rule 5
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.