Wakilii

Dr. Wanbette and Another v Impresa Ing. Fortunato Federici (Civil Suit 27 of 1995)

High Court · [1997] UGHC 11 · 1997 Judgment for Plaintiffs AI-generated summary ↓ Download Pin to watchlist Add to matter
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Type
First instance civil suit for damages arising from motor vehicle accident; defendant admitted liability; assessment of damages only
Decision
Judgment entered for the plaintiffs; defendant to pay damages and costs as ordered

Observed later treatment

Cited — treatment unverified cited in 1 (treatment unverified) Sequitur — Uganda’s citator · Derived from citing cases in the Wakilii corpus — not an assertion that this case is good law.

Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.

No adverse treatment recorded Cited 1 time with no adverse treatment recorded; not yet tested on the merits. Derived from citing cases in the Wakilii corpus — a deterministic signal, not legal advice.

AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.

Holding

Held that where the defendant admitted liability for a motor vehicle accident rendering a nine-year-old plaintiff deaf and dumb with 70% permanent disability, general damages of UGX 25,000,000 were appropriate, considering the plaintiff's young age, complete loss of speech and hearing faculties, and lifelong dependency. Medical reports compiled after the suit was filed were admissible where they reflected the plaintiff's condition after treatment and were not manufactured evidence. Special damages of UGX 598,000 strictly proved by receipts were awarded.

Outcome

Judgment entered for the plaintiffs; defendant to pay damages and costs as ordered

Facts

On 15 October 1995, the second plaintiff Irene Wabwire, aged nine years, was knocked down by motor vehicle registration number KAD 248 along Cathedral Avenue in Mbale Municipality. The vehicle belonged to the defendant and was driven by Ali Camusi, the defendant's employee acting within the scope of his employment. As a result of the accident, the second plaintiff sustained a compound fracture of the left femur and a closed head injury. She was unconscious for three days and upon completion of treatment became deaf and dumb. The first plaintiff, her father Dr. Julius Wambette, incurred medical expenses, transport costs, and costs of obtaining a traffic accident report. The defendant admitted liability and the matter proceeded to assessment of damages only.

Issues

  1. Whether the second plaintiff was knocked down due to the negligence of the defendant's servant
  2. Whether the second plaintiff suffered any injuries
  3. Whether the first plaintiff suffered any damages
  4. Whether the driver of the defendant was acting within the scope of his employment
  5. Whether the defendant was vicariously liable
  6. What remedies are available to the plaintiffs
  7. What is the quantum of damages

Orders

  • The defendant to pay the plaintiffs special damages of UGX 598,000 with interest at bank rate from date of filing until payment in full
  • The defendant to pay the second plaintiff general damages of UGX 25,000,000 with interest at court rate from date of judgment until payment in full
  • The defendant to pay the taxed costs of the suit

Rules and key headnotes

General Damages — Assessment — Young Children with Permanent Disability
Where a child of nine years sustains injuries resulting in complete loss of speech and hearing faculties with 70% permanent disability rendering her dependent for life, an award of general damages must reflect her young age and the prolonged period over which she will bear the loss of amenities compared to an older person.
Documentary Evidence — Medical Reports — Admissibility of Post-Filing Documents
A medical report compiled after a suit has been filed is admissible in evidence if the court is satisfied it depicts a true state of facts and was not manufactured as false evidence, particularly where injuries take time to heal and the report assesses the plaintiff's condition after completion of treatment.
Civil Procedure — Order 7 Rule 18 — Documents Not Annexed to Plaint
The purpose of Order 7 Rule 18 of the Civil Procedure Rules is to prevent parties from manufacturing evidence at trial by requiring documents to be listed or annexed to the plaint. However, documents not in existence at the time of filing but which genuinely record the plaintiff's post-treatment condition may be admitted if they reflect a true state of facts.
Advocate's Admissions — Binding Effect on Client
Where an advocate makes an admission of fact or of evidence, such admission binds the client. It is only when an admission is of a matter of law and proves incorrect that the client is not bound by it.
Expert Evidence — Medical Reports — Evidential Value Without Supporting Materials
While it is desirable that expert medical evidence be accompanied by clinical notes and materials showing how the expert arrived at conclusions, the absence of such materials does not necessarily vitiate the evidence if it is given convincingly and the court is satisfied as to its reliability.
Principles of Assessment — Purpose of General Damages
General damages are at the discretion of the court and are intended to put the plaintiff in as good a position in monetary terms as he or she would have been had the injury complained of not taken place.
Special Damages — Proof Requirements — Non-Documentary Transactions
Special damages must be specifically pleaded and strictly proved. While receipts are the best evidence for recorded transactions, special damages may be proved by other means for transactions not ordinarily recorded, provided the claim, transaction, or article is vividly described.

Legislation cited (2)

Cases cited (19)

  • Col Ndahendekire v Transocean (1975) HCB 302
  • Vencensio Kyalibera v West Mengo District Administration (1971) 1 ULR 273
  • Eastern Province Bus Company v G.W. Bibi (1971) 1 ULR 87
  • Barnabas Ntimba v UEB (Court of Appeal Civil Appeal No. 16 of 1992)
  • Austin Mperabusa v Paul Etot (High Court Civil Suit No. 52 of 1995)
  • Phillips v Ward [1956] 1 All ER 874
  • Eriab Lukyamusi v House & Tenant Agencies Ltd (1983) HCB 74
  • Pushpa v Fleet Transport Company [1960] EA 1025
  • Talituuka v Nakendo (1979) HCB 275
  • Kahwa & Another v UTC (1978) HCB 520
  • Apdum Lumodoi-Omodoi v Attorney General & Another (High Court Civil Suit No. 776 of 1990)
  • Uganda v Isumarisi Okello (1994) HCB 85
  • Lord Arbinger v Ashton (1875) LR Equity 358
  • Michael Mudedu v Attorney General (1979) HCB 150
  • Mutyaba Leonard Sembatya v Attorney General (Supreme Court Civil Appeal No. 21 of 1994)
  • Kibimba Rice Company (High Court Civil Suit No. 7 of 1988)
  • Consultancy Gas Engineering Co Ltd v Bitature & Another (Supreme Court Civil Appeal No. 56 of 1994)
  • Christopher Kiggundu & Daniel Ssentongo v Ugandan Transport Company 1975 Ltd (Supreme Court Civil Appeal No. 7 of 1995)
  • Attorney General v Baranga & Another (1976) HCB

Cases citing this judgment (1)

How later Ugandan judgments in the Wakilii corpus have cited this case. Treatment labels come from Sequitur — Uganda’s citator — each backed by a verbatim span from the citing judgment, and are not an assertion that this case is, or is not, good law.

Full judgment

↓ Download PDF

The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.

Dr. Wanbette and Another v Impresa Ing. Fortunato Federici (Civil Suit 27 of 1995) [1997] UGHC 11 (18 December 1997)
Source: this page presents Wakilii’s issue analysis and metadata for a publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Any AI-generated summary is marked as such. Judgment text is sourced from the Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org). Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.