East African Courier (U) Ltd v Hima Cement Ltd (HCT-00-CC-CS 337 of 2011)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
Where a defendant admits partial liability and judgment is entered on admission, with the remaining claim dismissed after the plaintiff concedes it cannot prove the balance, the plaintiff is entitled to costs on the decretal sum as costs follow the event. The fact that the defendant was indebted and only reconciled figures after being brought to court does not entitle the defendant to costs on the dismissed portion.
Outcome
Plaintiff recovered Ugx.11,320,000/= on admission; remaining claim dismissed but plaintiff awarded costs
Facts
East African Courier (U) Ltd contracted to perform courier services for Hima Cement Ltd between January 2006 and October 2011. The defendant paid for most services but left unpaid Ugx.51,909,507/=. The plaintiff sued to recover this amount plus interest at 30% from 4 October 2010. When the matter came for hearing on 3 July 2012, the defendant admitted liability for Ugx.11,320,000/= and judgment on admission was entered for that sum. The unadmitted part was scheduled for hearing. At the subsequent hearing, the plaintiff conceded through counsel that it could not prove the remaining sum after calling one witness. The defendant opposed an award of costs to the plaintiff and argued it should receive costs on the dismissed portion.
Issues
- Whether the plaintiff was entitled to costs after conceding it could not prove the full amount claimed beyond the sum admitted by the defendant.
- Whether the defendant was entitled to costs in respect of the dismissed part of the claim.
Orders
- Plaintiff's claim for the remaining part of the original claim dismissed.
- Costs of the suit to be borne by the defendant.
- Instruction fees to be based on the decretal sum of Ugx.11,320,000/=
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (1)
Cases cited (1)
- Dauda v Ahmed & Ors (1987) KLR 665
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.