Edge Trading Limited and Another v Root Capital Inc (Miscellaneous Application No.1674 of 2026)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The court granted a certificate of urgency for a set-aside application to be heard during court vacation. Where exparte orders have been made against an applicant and shareholders' meetings are proceeding under those orders while a set-aside application is pending, the applicant demonstrates urgency because continued enforcement renders the set-aside application nugatory.
Outcome
Certificate of urgency granted; set-aside application to proceed during vacation
Facts
On 30 April 2026, the High Court Commercial Division delivered a ruling in Company Cause No. 0023 of 2025 making exparte orders against the applicant company. The applicant contended it was not served with process leading to those proceedings. The applicant filed Miscellaneous Application No. 1145 of 2026 to set aside the ruling and orders. The debt alleged by the respondent is disputed and is the subject of Civil Suit No. 1323 of 2024. Despite the pending set-aside application, the Official Receiver issued letters dated 16 July 2026 calling preliminary shareholders' meetings, which were held on 22 and 23 July 2026. The applicant sought a certificate of urgency to have the set-aside application heard during court vacation, contending that ongoing enforcement of the exparte orders would render the set-aside application nugatory.
Issues
- Whether the Applicant has established sufficient grounds for the grant of a certificate of urgency?
Orders
- A certificate of urgency is granted in Miscellaneous Application No. 1145 of 2026 to be heard during Court vacation.
- Costs shall be in the cause.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (4)
- Civil Procedure Act Cap. 282 s.98
- Judicature Act Cap. 16 s.37
- Judicature (Court Vacation) Rules SI No. 13-20 Rule 4
- Civil Procedure Rules SI 71-1 Order 52 Rules 1, 2 & 3
Cases cited (2)
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.