Edith Nagujja Jakana v Commissioner Land Registration and Another [2026] UGHCLD 103
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The application, filed on 14 March 2022, was dismissed for want of prosecution because neither party had taken any step to advance the matter since filing. The court invoked Order 17 rule 6 of the Civil Procedure Rules and section 17(2) of the Judicature Act to dispose of the dormant application. The ruling determines no substantive question of land law and records no order as to costs.
Outcome
Application dismissed for want of prosecution
Facts
The applicant, Edith Nagujja Jakana, suing through her lawful attorney Beatrice Kagga Jakana, filed Miscellaneous Application No. 321 of 2022 on 14 March 2022 against the Commissioner Land Registration and Jakana Foods Limited. The application arose from Miscellaneous Applications Nos. 2333 and 2100 of 2021 and from Civil Suit No. 1090 of 2019. After filing, neither the applicant nor the respondents took any step with a view to proceeding with the matter. The court, noting the inaction, dismissed the application for want of prosecution.
Issues
- Whether the application should be dismissed for want of prosecution where no step had been taken by either party since filing.
Orders
- The application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (2)
- Civil Procedure Rules O.17 r.6
- Judicature Act s.17(2)
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.