Wakilii

Edith Nantumbwe Kizito and Others v Wilberforce Ssekubwa and Others (Miscellaneous Application No. 1366 of 2025)

High Court · [2026] UGHCLD 93 · 2026 Application Withdrawn AI-generated summary ↓ Download Pin to watchlist Add to matter
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Type
Miscellaneous application arising from Court of Appeal Civil Appeal No. 441 of 2022, withdrawn by consent
Decision
Application withdrawn by consent with costs to the respondents

Observed later treatment

No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.

Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.

AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.

Holding

The High Court Land Division granted the applicants' prayer to withdraw Miscellaneous Application No. 1366 of 2025. By consent of the parties, the applicants were ordered to pay costs of UGX 4,000,000 to the respondents within one month, with liberty to execute if payment was not made within the stipulated period.

Outcome

Application withdrawn by consent with costs to the respondents

Facts

The applicants brought Miscellaneous Application No. 1366 of 2025 arising from Court of Appeal Civil Appeal No. 441 of 2022. During the hearing, the 2nd Applicant confirmed that the matter should be withdrawn. The respondents had no objection to the withdrawal but requested costs. The parties negotiated and agreed on the quantum of costs to be paid.

Issues

  1. Whether the miscellaneous application should be withdrawn as prayed by the applicants.

Orders

  • Miscellaneous Application No. 1366 of 2025 is hereby withdrawn as prayed by the Applicants.
  • By consent of the parties the Applicants shall pay costs of 4,000,000/= (Four Million Uganda Shillings) to the Respondents, within one month, that is by 2nd May 2026.
  • In the event that the said money is not paid within that period, the 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 5th Respondents will be at liberty to proceed with execution.

Full judgment

↓ Download PDF

The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.

Edith_Nantumbwe_Kizito_and_Others_v_Wilberforce_Ssekubwa_and_Others_(Miscellaneous_Application_No._1366_of_2025)_[2026]_UGHCLD_93_(1_April_2026)
Source: this page presents Wakilii’s issue analysis and metadata for a publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Any AI-generated summary is marked as such. Judgment text is sourced from the Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org). Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.