Edward Rubanga v Bashasha & Co. Advocates (Civil Appeal No. 258 of 2018)
Legal issues
About this case
AI-generated summary — verify against the full judgment before relying on it.
Held that a UGX 50m instruction fee for a summarily dismissed taxation application was manifestly excessive; reduced to UGX 3m, with the unreasoned taxation ruling faulted as an error in principle.
Ask Wakilii about this case
Get a cited answer on how Edward Rubanga applies to your facts, grounded in Ugandan statutes and case law.
Research this case →
Source: this page presents Wakilii's issue analysis and metadata for a
publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Judgment text is sourced from the
Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org).
Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.