Egyptian Initiative for Personal Rights and Interights v Arab Republic of Egypt (Communication 323 of 2006)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The African Commission held that the communication was inadmissible because the applicant had not exhausted local remedies as required by Article 56 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights and Article 114 of the Commission's Rules of Procedure.
Outcome
Communication declared inadmissible for failure to exhaust local remedies
Facts
Albert T. Capitao filed a communication with the African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights against Tanzania concerning recovery of money. The communication was dated March 26, 1991. The Commission examined whether the applicant had satisfied the admissibility requirements under the African Charter and the Commission's Rules of Procedure.
Issues
- Whether local remedies have been exhausted as required by Article 56 of the African Charter and Article 114 of the Rules of Procedure.
Orders
- Communication declared inadmissible.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (2)
- African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights Article 56
- Rules of Procedure of the African Commission Article 114
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.