Wakilii

Egyptian Organisation For Human Rights v Egypt (Communication 201 of 1997)

African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights · [2000] ACHPR 16 · 2000 Communication Inadmissible AI-generated summary ↓ Download Pin to watchlist Add to matter
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Type
Human rights communication alleging violations of the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights
Decision
Communication closed due to failure to satisfy admissibility requirements

Observed later treatment

No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.

Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.

AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.

Holding

The African Commission declared the communication inadmissible for failure to exhaust domestic remedies. Despite repeated requests, neither party provided information demonstrating exhaustion of local remedies. The Commission noted that the complaint had been pending for a long time and that conditions for admissibility under Article 56(5) of the Charter had not been satisfied.

Outcome

Communication closed due to failure to satisfy admissibility requirements

Facts

On 17 June 1997, Egyptian State Security Investigation forces arrested eight individuals for peacefully opposing Law 96 of 1992, which regulates relations between landowners and tenants of agricultural land. The arrested persons included a journalist, veterinarian, lawyers, and farmers. Some were arrested for hanging black banners in protest, others for participating in a rally, and one for promoting a petition to the President. Four individuals were charged under anti-terrorist provisions of the Penal Code with promoting ideas opposing the regime and inciting resistance. Following imprisonment, the four charged individuals were allegedly beaten, stripped, had their heads shaved, and were forced to wear prison uniforms. The Egyptian Organisation for Human Rights filed a communication alleging violations of multiple articles of the African Charter.

Issues

  1. Whether the communication satisfied the admissibility requirement of exhaustion of local remedies under Article 56(5) of the African Charter.

Orders

  • Communication declared inadmissible.

Rules and key headnotes

Human Rights — Admissibility of Communications — Exhaustion of Local Remedies
A communication before the African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights will be declared inadmissible where the complainant fails to demonstrate exhaustion of local remedies as required by Article 56(5) of the African Charter, and neither party responds to the Commission's repeated requests for information on this issue.

Legislation cited (9)

  • African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights Article 2
  • African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights Article 3
  • African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights Article 4
  • African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights Article 5
  • African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights Article 6
  • African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights Article 7
  • African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights Article 9
  • African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights Article 11
  • African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights Article 56(5)

Full judgment

↓ Download PDF

The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.

Egyptian Organisation For Human Rights v Egypt (Communication 201 of 1997) [2000] ACHPR 16 (11 May 2000)
Source: this page presents Wakilii’s issue analysis and metadata for a publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Any AI-generated summary is marked as such. Judgment text is sourced from the Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org). Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.