El-Riami and Others v Wakf Commissioners, Zanzibar (Civil Appeal No. 1 of 1946)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
A testamentary wakf providing for children, grandchildren, their posterity, then near relatives, and ultimately poor Muslims was held void. The court found the gift to the poor so remote and uncertain as to be illusory, as the poor would receive benefit only after extinction of posterity and near relatives. The wakf was merely a colour of piety to legalize family aggrandizement. Appeal allowed; property declared part of heritable estate.
Outcome
Property declared part of heritable estate of Ahmed bin Nassor; matter remitted to High Court for administration and division amongst heirs
Facts
Asha binti Juma made a will on 21st December 1880 purporting to create a wakf of property at Kiungani for her children, grandchildren, and their posterity. Upon their extinction, the wakf was to revert to her near relatives amongst Muslims, then to poor Muslims of the Ibathi sect. Ahmed bin Nassor, grandson of the testatrix, was declared a lunatic in 1913. The Public Trustee received rents and profits until Ahmed's death on 26th February 1944. The appellants, as heirs of Ahmed bin Nassor, challenged the validity of the wakf, claiming the property formed part of Ahmed's heritable estate. The High Court of Zanzibar upheld the wakf. Respondents did not appear at the appeal hearing.
Issues
- Whether a valid wakf was created by the will of Asha binti Juma dated 21st December 1880.
- Whether the ultimate gift to the poor Muslims was so remote or uncertain as to render the wakf illusory and void.
Orders
- Appeal allowed.
- Costs awarded to appellants in this Court and the High Court.
- Property declared part of the heritable estate of Ahmed bin Nassor.
- Defendants directed to give up property to person appointed by High Court of Zanzibar for administration and division amongst heirs of Ahmed bin Nassor according to law.
- Case remitted to High Court for that purpose.
Rules and key headnotes
Cases cited (2)
- Sulleman bin Ahmed v Salem bin Abdulla (1 Z.L.R. 328)
- Abul Fata Mahomed Ishak and Others v Rasamaya Dhur Chowdri and Others (22 Calc. 619)
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.