Wakilii

Elimu v Akello (Miscellaneous Application No. 153 of 2022)

High Court · [2023] UGHCCD 123 · 2023 Application Granted AI-generated summary ↓ Download Pin to watchlist Add to matter
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Type
Application to set aside dismissal of civil appeal and for readmission of the appeal
Decision
Appeal readmitted for hearing on merits; applicant directed to fix appeal within two months or face dismissal with costs

Observed later treatment

Cited — treatment unverified cited in 1 (treatment unverified) Sequitur — Uganda’s citator · Derived from citing cases in the Wakilii corpus — not an assertion that this case is good law.

Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.

No adverse treatment recorded Cited 1 time with no adverse treatment recorded; not yet tested on the merits. Derived from citing cases in the Wakilii corpus — a deterministic signal, not legal advice.

AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.

Holding

The court held that sufficient cause was shown for the applicant's non-appearance at the hearing of the dismissed appeal. COVID-19 restrictions during the relevant period, absence of evidence that the applicant was notified of the final hearing date, and non-receipt of the lower court record constituted sufficient cause under Order 43 Rule 16 of the Civil Procedure Rules. The appeal was readmitted in the interest of justice, particularly given that it concerned a land matter requiring determination on merit.

Outcome

Appeal readmitted for hearing on merits; applicant directed to fix appeal within two months or face dismissal with costs

Facts

The applicant filed Civil Appeal No. 02 of 2021 on 9 February 2021 arising from a land dispute decided by Soroti Chief Magistrate's Court in Civil Suit No. 038 of 2017. The appeal was fixed for hearing on 28 April 2021 and 1 July 2021, but neither party appeared. On 17 September 2021, only the respondent appeared. The matter was adjourned to 20 September 2021. On that date, only the respondent appeared and the appeal was dismissed for the applicant's non-appearance. The applicant then filed this application in November 2022 seeking to set aside the dismissal order. The applicant claimed he was not notified of hearing dates due to COVID-19 disruptions and had not received the lower court record. The respondent opposed, arguing inordinate delay and that COVID-19 restrictions had been lifted by the time of dismissal.

Issues

  1. Whether there are any justifiable grounds to merit setting aside the order dismissing HCCA No. 02 of 2021?
  2. What are the remedies available to the parties in the circumstances?

Orders

  • The order dismissing H.C.C.A No. 02 of 2021 is set aside.
  • Civil Appeal No. 02 of 2021 is re-admitted.
  • The costs of this application is awarded to the respondent.
  • The applicant is directed to fix the impugned appeal for hearing and determination on own merits within Two (2) months from the date hereof and any failure to do so would render the appeal dismissed with costs to the respondent.

Rules and key headnotes

Civil Procedure — Appeals — Readmission of Dismissed Appeals — Sufficient Cause
Under Order 43 Rule 16 of the Civil Procedure Rules, an appeal dismissed for default may be readmitted where the appellant proves he was prevented by sufficient cause from appearing when the appeal was called for hearing.
Civil Procedure — Sufficient Cause — COVID-19 Pandemic Restrictions
COVID-19 restrictions imposed over the country from March 2020 to early 2022 may constitute sufficient cause for non-prosecution of appeals, particularly where the restrictions affected court operations and the fixing of cases during the relevant period.
Civil Procedure — Natural Justice — Notice of Hearing
Where an appeal is dismissed for non-appearance but there is no evidence on the court record that the appellant was notified of the hearing date, this constitutes a ground for setting aside the dismissal order.
Civil Procedure — Appeals — Non-Receipt of Lower Court Record
Where an appellant has requested a copy of the lower court proceedings and record but has not received it, this may constitute sufficient cause for failure to prosecute an appeal, as the period taken by the registrar in preparing the record does not count against the appellant.
Civil Procedure — Judicial Discretion — Determination on Merits
As a foundational principle of justice, every case regardless of its merit must be determined on merit, and courts as vehicles of justice should be slow to turn away a litigant or case without hearing them unless there are good reasons to do so.
Land & Property — Land Disputes — Judicial Discretion in Appeals
Where an appeal concerns a land matter, courts are enjoined by Section 98 of the Civil Procedure Act and Section 33 of the Judicature Act to make such orders as the interest of justice would demand in order to avoid unnecessary litigation and ensure conclusive determination on merits.

Legislation cited (8)

Cases cited (7)

  • Abel Belemesa v Yesero Mugenyi (HCMA No. 126 of 2019)
  • Attorney General v Gladys Nakibuule Kisseka (Constitutional Appeal No. 2 of 2016)
  • Musini v Wabwiso [1976] HCB 349
  • Isadru v Aroma & Ors (HCCA No. 0033 of 2014)
  • Solland International Ltd v. Clifford Harris & Co [2015] EWHC 2018
  • Phelps v. Button [2016] EWHC 3185
  • Ephraim Ongom v Francis Benega (SCCA No. 10 of 1987)

Cases citing this judgment (1)

How later Ugandan judgments in the Wakilii corpus have cited this case. Treatment labels come from Sequitur — Uganda’s citator — each backed by a verbatim span from the citing judgment, and are not an assertion that this case is, or is not, good law.

Full judgment

↓ Download PDF

The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.

Elimu v Akello (Miscellaneous Application No. 153 of 2022) [2023] UGHCCD 123 (13 April 2023)
Source: this page presents Wakilii’s issue analysis and metadata for a publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Any AI-generated summary is marked as such. Judgment text is sourced from the Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org). Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.