Emmanuel Nsubuga v Uganda (CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 16 88)
Legal issues
About this case
AI-generated summary — verify against the full judgment before relying on it.
Held that unreliable visual identification, with material discrepancies and no identification parade, cannot ground a robbery conviction; conviction quashed.
Ask Wakilii about this case
Get a cited answer on how Emmanuel Nsubuga applies to your facts, grounded in Ugandan statutes and case law.
Research this case →
Source: this page presents Wakilii's issue analysis and metadata for a
publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Judgment text is sourced from the
Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org).
Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.