Ephraim Ongom Odongo v Francis Benega Bonge [1988] UGSC 1
Legal issues
About this case
AI-generated summary — verify against the full judgment before relying on it.
Held that sufficiency of evidence is a question of fact beyond a second appeal, and the first appellate court had adequately re-evaluated the evidence.
Ask Wakilii about this case
Get a cited answer on how Ephraim Ongom Odongo applies to your facts, grounded in Ugandan statutes and case law.
Research this case →
Source: this page presents Wakilii's issue analysis and metadata for a
publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Judgment text is sourced from the
Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org).
Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.