Equator Touring Services v Kampala City Council (HCCS 763 of 2007)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
A contract entered into by a local government without the Attorney General's legal advice required by article 119(5) of the Constitution is null and void where the contract value exceeds UGX 50 million. The contract in question, worth UGX 555,642,000 over three years, was held to be a nullity. Gazetting is not a statutory requirement for the establishment of a market under the Markets Act.
Outcome
Contract declared null and void for failure to obtain Attorney General's advice as required by Constitution article 119(5); plaintiff's claim dismissed
Facts
In 1999, Kampala City Council advertised a tender for management of Nakivubo Park Yard Market. Equator Touring Services Ltd was awarded the tender and entered into a market management agreement on 15 December 2000. The contract was extended on 1 April 2005 for three years at a monthly consideration of UGX 15,434,500. The plaintiff made payments totaling approximately UGX 1 billion over eight years. In January 2008, the defendant terminated the contract. The defendant alleged that the plaintiff assigned its obligations without consent and defaulted on payments. The parties agreed to refer two questions of law to court: the validity and legality of the contract, and whether gazetting was required to establish a market. The 2005 contract extension preamble stated that the Council was unable to consider fresh bids due to a pending civil suit. Neither the 2000 contract nor the 2005 extension was submitted to the Attorney General for legal advice as required by the Constitution.
Issues
- Whether the contract for the management of Nakivubo Park Yard market entered into by the parties was a valid and legal contract?
- Whether gazetting is a requirement for a market to be established under the laws of Uganda?
Orders
- The contract dated 1 April 2005 between Equator Touring Services Ltd and Kampala City Council is declared a nullity.
- The first issue is answered in the negative — the contract was not a valid and legal contract.
- The second issue is answered — gazetting is not a requirement for a market to be established under the laws of Uganda.
- Each party shall bear its own costs of the suit.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (20)
- Constitution of Uganda article 2
- Constitution of Uganda article 119(5)
- Constitution (Exemption of Particular Contracts from Attorney General's Legal Advice) Instrument, Statutory Instrument - Constitution 12 paragraph 2(1)
- Contract Act No. 7 of 2010 s.10(1)
- Public Procurement and Disposal of Public Assets Act 2003 s.2(1)
- Public Procurement and Disposal of Public Assets Act 2003 s.3
- Public Procurement and Disposal of Public Assets Act 2003 s.24
- Public Procurement and Disposal of Public Assets Act 2003 s.55
- Public Procurement and Disposal of Public Assets Act 2003 s.98(2)
- Public Procurement and Disposal of Public Assets Act 2003 s.98(3)
- Public Procurement and Disposal of Public Assets Act 2003 s.99
- Public Procurement and Disposal of Public Assets Regulations 2003 regulation 2
- Local Governments (Public Procurement and Disposal of Public Assets) Regulations 2006 regulation 86(2)(f)
- Local Governments Act cap 245 s.91(1)
- Local Governments Act cap 245 s.91(7)
- Local Governments (Financial and Accounting) Regulations regulation 75
- Local Governments (Kampala City Council) (Markets) Ordinance No. 15 of 2006 paragraph 4
- Markets Act cap 94 s.1(1)
- Markets Act cap 94 s.1(2)
- Civil Procedure Rules Order 6 rule 7
Cases cited (6)
- JK Patel v Spear Motors Limited (SCCA No. 4 of 1991)
- Interfreight Forwarders (U) Ltd v East African Development Bank (Civil Appeal No. 33 of 1992)
- Nsimbe Holdings Limited v Attorney General (Constitutional Petition No. 2 of 2006)
- Makula International Ltd v His Eminence Cardinal Nsubuga [1982] HCB 11
- Cullimore vs. Lyme Regis Corporation [1961] 3 All ER 1008
- Finishing Touches Ltd v Attorney General (HCCS No. 144 of 2010)
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.