Erachu and Another v Emenyu (Civil Appeal 5 of 2022)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
Held that an appeal cannot be determined without arguments substantiating the grounds raised in the memorandum of appeal. Where appellants fail to file written submissions or argue their appeal after multiple adjournments and schedules, they are taken to have abandoned the appeal. Under Order 43 Rule 14(1) of the Civil Procedure Rules, the court may dismiss an appeal where the appellant does not appear or proceed on the day fixed for hearing. The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution with costs to the respondent.
Outcome
Appeal dismissed for failure to prosecute
Facts
The appellants filed a civil appeal on 17 February 2022 against the judgment of the Chief Magistrate's Court of Kaberamaido in Civil Suit No. 6 of 2018. The appellants initially appeared in person, then briefly with counsel Agnes on 23 June 2022 (though no instructions were on record), while the respondent was continuously represented by counsel Timothy Erabu. The court made multiple adjournments and issued schedules directing the appellants to file written submissions or argue orally. The appellants failed to comply despite a schedule issued as late as 20 February 2024. The respondent's counsel wrote to court on 3 May 2022 and again on 6 June 2023 requesting dismissal for want of prosecution. The appellants were repeatedly absent and took no step to prosecute the appeal after filing it.
Issues
- Whether the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution where the appellants failed to file written submissions or argue the appeal despite multiple adjournments and schedules.
Orders
- Civil Appeal No. 5 of 2022 dismissed for want of prosecution.
- Costs awarded to the respondent.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (2)
- Civil Procedure Rules O.43 r.13
- Civil Procedure Rules O.43 r.14(1)
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.