Wakilii

Ex Parte

East African Court of Appeal · [1956] EACA 293 · 1950 Application Dismissed AI-generated summary ↓ Download Pin to watchlist Add to matter
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Type
Application for refund of fees paid upon lodging four appeals that were subsequently withdrawn before hearing
Decision
Application for refund of fees dismissed for lack of jurisdiction

Observed later treatment

No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.

Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.

AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.

Holding

The Court held that appeals were lodged when records were accepted in the Registry, even if filed out of time. Fees paid to the Registrar were not conditional deposits but absolute payments. The Court has no express power under the Eastern African Court of Appeal Rules, 1954, to order refunds of fees paid into general revenue, this being a matter for administrative or revenue authorities. Application dismissed.

Outcome

Application for refund of fees dismissed for lack of jurisdiction

Facts

The Collector under the Indian Land Acquisition Act gave notice of appeal on 24 February 1956 from four Supreme Court awards regarding compulsory land acquisition in Nairobi. The records were filed on 5 June 1956, outside the 60-day time limit prescribed by rule 58. The Registrar accepted the appeals under rule 11 and directed the appellant to apply for an extension of time. Fees totalling Sh. 5,308 were paid. Before the extension hearing on 28 June, the appellant instructed his advocates to withdraw the appeals on 21 June. The extension application was dismissed with costs. The appellant then sought a refund of the fees, arguing they were deposited conditionally on leave being granted and that the appeals had not been legally lodged. The Registrar refused, stating there was no provision in the Rules for refunds and that fees paid into revenue were a matter for the Treasury.

Issues

  1. Whether fees paid to the Registrar upon lodging appeals out of time were 'deposited' conditionally or 'paid' absolutely.
  2. Whether appeals filed out of time but accepted by the Registrar were 'lodged' for purposes of fee payment.
  3. Whether the Court has jurisdiction to order a refund of fees paid into general revenue.

Orders

  • Application dismissed.

Rules and key headnotes

Civil Procedure — Appeals — Filing of appeals out of time — Effect of acceptance by Registrar
Where an appeal is delivered to the Registrar out of time, the Registrar cannot refuse to accept it for filing under rule 11(1) of the Eastern African Court of Appeal Rules, 1954, and the appeal is filed and lodged when the records are accepted in the Registry, albeit irregularly filed.
Civil Procedure — Court fees — Nature of payment — Distinction between deposit and payment
Fees paid to the Registrar upon lodging an appeal are absolute payments, not conditional deposits. The Registrar has no power to accept a deposit in respect of fees payable upon lodging an appeal; he can only accept and file an appeal upon payment of fees.
Civil Procedure — Court fees — Refund — Jurisdiction of Court
In the absence of an express enabling provision in the Court's Rules, neither the Court nor any Judge thereof has jurisdiction to authorize refunds of fees paid into the general revenues of a constituent territory, this being a matter for the administrative or revenue authorities.
Administrative Law — Public revenue — Court's power to order payments from revenue
Fees paid in respect of court proceedings do not constitute revenue of the Court but are paid into the general revenues of the territory wherein the proceedings giving rise to the appeal were commenced, and the Court cannot order payments to be made out of such general revenues without statutory authority.

Legislation cited (6)

  • Indian Land Acquisition Act, 1894
  • Eastern African Court of Appeal Rules, 1954 rule 11(1)
  • Eastern African Court of Appeal Rules, 1954 rule 11(2)
  • Eastern African Court of Appeal Rules, 1954 rule 58
  • Eastern African Court of Appeal Order in Council, 1950 s.19(4)
  • Eastern African Court of Appeal Rules, 1925 First Schedule

Full judgment

↓ Download PDF

The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.

Ex Parte [1950] EACA 293 (1 January 1950)
Source: this page presents Wakilii’s issue analysis and metadata for a publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Any AI-generated summary is marked as such. Judgment text is sourced from the Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org). Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.