Falasiko Musoke and 9 Others v Muhammed Ssempijja and Others (Miscellaneous Application 171 of 2019)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The High Court dismissed a miscellaneous application filed in 2019 for want of prosecution under section 17(2) of the Judicature Act. Neither party appeared at the hearing and the application had not been diligently prosecuted since filing. No order as to costs was made.
Outcome
Application dismissed for want of prosecution
Facts
The applicants filed a miscellaneous application in the Land Division in 2019. When the matter came up for hearing on 27 August 2025, none of the parties were present in court. The application had not been diligently prosecuted since its filing.
Issues
- Whether the application should be dismissed for want of prosecution
Orders
- Application dismissed for want of prosecution.
- No order as to costs.
Legislation cited (1)
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.