Fidele and Another v Côte d'Ivoire (Application No. 046-2019; Application No. 048-2019)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The Court ordered the joinder of two applications filed by different applicants against Côte d'Ivoire where both applicants were represented by the same lawyer, the applications arose from the same trial and sentencing, alleged similar violations of fair trial rights, and sought similar relief.
Outcome
Applications joined for consolidated hearing
Facts
Aka Yao Bossin Fidèle and Zakaria Sanogo filed separate applications on 2 October 2019 against the Republic of Côte d'Ivoire. Both applicants were tried and sentenced to twenty years imprisonment by the Abidjan-Plateau Court of First Instance for theft and armed robbery without legal representation. The sentence was upheld by the Abidjan Court of Appeal. Both applicants were represented by the same lawyer and alleged violations of their rights to fair trial, effective remedy, access to counsel, justice and equality of arms under the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
Issues
- Whether the two applications should be joined for hearing and determination
Orders
- The joinder of Applications Nos. 046/2019 and 048/2019 and related pleadings ordered.
- The applications to be referred to as 'Consolidated Applications Nos. 046/2019 and 048/2019 - Aka Yao Bossin Fidèle and Another v. Republic of Côte d'Ivoire'.
- This Order and the pleadings relating to the matters to be served on all parties.
Rules and key headnotes
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.